I would expect the messenger to actually learn just a little bit about the objective system that he is so obsessed about. It is better to discuss something intelligently when both parties understand what it is they are discussing.
Yes it would be better, but it seems that YOU & some others know NOTHING about what objective & objectivity are.
It's a simple issue.
CTE is NOT objective in it's nature.
Please give a complete & detailed logical, rational, objective explanation as to how & why it is, if you say that it is, & please do so with no nonsense nor subjective wording nor breaking any laws of science.
I won't hold my breath.
The reason that it is NOT objective in it's nature is it does NOT have a 'system' or method to view an objective marker or combination of markers or any specific objective instructions for all of the individual outcome angles needed.
Telling one to look for this as you 'move until you see the proper perception for the shot'... is NOT any specific objective instruction.
That is just like telling one to stand where you can see the CTC line & then 'move until you see the proper perception for the shot'.
Best Wishes.
PS Please don't 'attack' the messenger. Please deal with the 'message'. Every interested party can see the continuing tactic of attacking the messengerS used by nearly all CTE advocates..
Last edited: