Has anyone attempted an Elo-style rating system for tournament play?
In games with races you could rate by the game to get the sample size up high enough. So A beats B 9-7 would be treated as player A winning 9 of 16 matches vs. B's rating. Is the variance in tournament play too great for these types of ratings to provide meaningful results?
Just how predictable are tournament brackets anyway?
In games with races you could rate by the game to get the sample size up high enough. So A beats B 9-7 would be treated as player A winning 9 of 16 matches vs. B's rating. Is the variance in tournament play too great for these types of ratings to provide meaningful results?
Just how predictable are tournament brackets anyway?