I was watching the Cisero murphy vs. Lassiter match and began to notice their stances. Both of the players were very upright, heads a foot or two above the cue. More like 3 cushion players stand. It seems like all the older players shot this way (Mosconi, Caras, Greenleaf, Crane), many with great results. If you check out the legendary stars of pocket billiards, they all shoot this way.
As time went on, it seems, players began to get lower and lower over the cue, much more like a snooker player, with the chin right over the cue.
so...
Why did this change occur? It seems to me that the pendulum swing requires the player be as low as possible. The older players had swings that are more of a double fulcrum. I find it very difficult to play standing so upright. But the worlds highest run was accomplished with such a stance.
The older players stance also allowed them to use a shorter cue, and hold the cue much closer to the balance point. When Mosconi talks about holding a cue near the balance point in his book, i think it's because he is talking about the upright stance. Such advice makes no sense with the snooker stance. With the lower stance, the back arm has to move back along the handle, requiring some players (like me) to hold the cue at the very rear, in order to achieve a proper pendulum stroke. This stance may be responsible for the evolution of longer cues.
Just wondering everyones opinion on the subject. How would you describe your stance. Does one offer an advantage over the other?
Just food for thought.
As time went on, it seems, players began to get lower and lower over the cue, much more like a snooker player, with the chin right over the cue.
so...
Why did this change occur? It seems to me that the pendulum swing requires the player be as low as possible. The older players had swings that are more of a double fulcrum. I find it very difficult to play standing so upright. But the worlds highest run was accomplished with such a stance.
The older players stance also allowed them to use a shorter cue, and hold the cue much closer to the balance point. When Mosconi talks about holding a cue near the balance point in his book, i think it's because he is talking about the upright stance. Such advice makes no sense with the snooker stance. With the lower stance, the back arm has to move back along the handle, requiring some players (like me) to hold the cue at the very rear, in order to achieve a proper pendulum stroke. This stance may be responsible for the evolution of longer cues.
Just wondering everyones opinion on the subject. How would you describe your stance. Does one offer an advantage over the other?
Just food for thought.