Therer's a good book about this: Eats, Shoots & Leaves
Here's where the title comes from:
"The title of the book is an amphibology—a verbal fallacy arising from an ambiguous grammatical construction—and derived from a joke on bad punctuation:
A panda walks into a café. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and proceeds to fire it at the other patrons.
'Why?' asks the confused, surviving waiter amidst the carnage, as the panda makes towards the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.
'Well, I'm a panda,' he says, at the door. 'Look it up.'
The waiter turns to the relevant entry in the manual and, sure enough, finds an explanation. 'Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves.'"
I've been a technical writer and newspaper guy. I've learned an important thing about grammar--it's constantly changing. I try to tone things down in forums, where the most important thing is getting a point across.
Know your audience.
That's a great analogy. :thumbup:
We got into a really heated debate about serial commas on my industry forum, and somebody posted up this cartoon. Everybody had a good chuckle and quit arguing about the serial commas thereafter.
