REB said:
It is a scientifically proven fact that a true full splice cue is the best tool for the job. I didn't prove it, but Burton Spain was responsible for bringing out the scientific proof in his thesis to the Mensa Society. Notable cue makers even knew it before, but he documented it. Mr. Hercek and Mr. Bear are both at the top of their game making full splice cues on a full time basis. I doubt seriously if you could get Joel to take another order due to the (i was told) 9 year wait. He has recently referred customers to Mark Bear. I play with one of Mark's full splices with his own laminated shaft, and i have no plans to look any farther. It is the best tool for the job! Good luck with your game, REB
I am afraid I am a bit confused here. Just exactly how did Burton Spain prove that a full spliced cue is the best tool for the job to make it a "scientifically proven" fact?
I have tried a lot of half spiced and CNC cues that hit very solid, just to name a few, Southwest, Cognoscenti, Paul Mottey, Bender, Layani, Richard Harris, Gina, Bobby Hunter, Tim Scruggs, Mike Capone, Keith Josey...etc.
I am of the opinion that if a cue is well constructed and well balanced, it will perform well. Full splicing is one way of making a well constructed blank, but why is it the best?
Besides, the full spliced blank does not in itself warrant a nice balance.
Joel Hercek is a master and he makes some top notch cues. I have tried his cues and they hit great--the butt was a bit on the fat side for my little hand unfortunately.
I am wondering with all the technology advancements, why is it that people still believe only full spliced can produce the most solid hitting cue?
Could you please share with us how Burton Spain proved his point to make this a scientifically proven fact?
Thank you.
Tiff