Gold Crown 1 vs Gold Crown 2

xianmacx

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Good Morning,
This post is to share my experiences and research on a frequently discussed topic: Is this a GC1 or 2?
I am not a mechanic, just a Gold crown fan and everything below is my opinion. My opinion was formed based on documentation from Brunswick as well as hands on inspection of 4 unmolested GC1 tables and 1 unmolested GC2 table.

Why the confusion?

1. Brunswick documentation is limited. The comparison sheet is helpful but doesn’t show all the features
2. GC1 was around for about 13 years 61-74 and had a number of functional improvements through that time. I am separating those changes in “early GC1 features” and “late GC1 features”. When the late gc1 features appeared, people began referring to these as GC2 tables. 40 years of repeating these statements, turned them into “facts”. As an example, I recall as a kid in the pool hall hearing “if the feet adjust it’s a GC2”.
3. GC2 were only around for a couple years 74-76 and not nearly as popular. I believe they were identical to late GC1 with the exception of a couple cosmetic changes I’ll cover later.

How can I tell if I have a GC1 or a GC2?

1. If the table is unmolested and hasn’t been painted, it will have a decal on the stretcher. If it doesn’t have a GC2 decal, IT’S A GC1!! (see image)
2. If the table has been repainted and so forth, I believe the only way to tell is the ball box and feet. On a GC2 they are Bronze. (see image)

Early GC1 - Features

1. Non-adjustable feet
2. Plastic Nameplate
3. Long rail extrusion
4. Figure 8 nut plate

Late GC1 – Features

1. Adjustable feet
2. Metal Nameplate
3. Short rail extrusions
4. Floating nutplate
These features appeared during the span of the GC1 table, so a table may have some of the early and late features.

GC2 - Features

1. Adjustable feet
2. Floating nutplate
3. Short extrusion
4. Metal nameplate

In summary,

I believe many years repeating information has turned assumptions into facts. The GC1 had a handful of feature changes that led to this confusion. The GC2 was only around for a couple years after the pool boom died. It is rare to see a real GC2. I would guess 95% of tables posted are GC1. If it doesn’t have a GC2 decal, Bronze ballbox and Feet, it’s a GC1!!
Hope everyone has a great day,
Ian
 

Attachments

  • decals.jpg
    decals.jpg
    191.4 KB · Views: 397
  • feet.jpg
    feet.jpg
    108.3 KB · Views: 368
  • GC2.jpg
    GC2.jpg
    148.6 KB · Views: 386
  • Nameplates.jpg
    Nameplates.jpg
    136.4 KB · Views: 381
  • nutplates.jpg
    nutplates.jpg
    227.5 KB · Views: 355
  • extrusion (Medium).png
    extrusion (Medium).png
    853.2 KB · Views: 389
Sounds about right to me, but the molested vs. unmolested is kinda in question to me. In many cases there is no way of knowing what originally came with a table. The factory was known to mix and mismatch to. So really these differences are just a general rule of thumb. It’s not like auto manufacturers back in the 60s that stuck to 100% accurate build specs.
 
Sounds about right to me, but the molested vs. unmolested is kinda in question to me. In many cases there is no way of knowing what originally came with a table. The factory was known to mix and mismatch to. So really these differences are just a general rule of thumb. It’s not like auto manufacturers back in the 60s that stuck to 100% accurate build specs.
As delivered from brunswick. Not a frankentable that became a variety of parts due to mix and match by pool hall owners and mechanics after it left brunswick.
 
My late GCI has all of the late GCI attributes listed above including the AR6100 sticker on the stretcher.
 
My late GCI has all of the late GCI attributes listed above including the AR6100 sticker on the
Nice. Of the 5 tables I examined, 4 had all early or late feature. The mot recent one I looked at had all late features except it has figure 8 nut plate.
 
The early GC I's had Brun stone, a reddish type bed NOT SLATE, fixable if cracked.
Because the early GCI feet were not adjustable, the bed was thicker, and heavier.....allowing the play surface height to be correct.
 
The early GC I's had Brun stone, a reddish type bed NOT SLATE, fixable if cracked.
Because the early GCI feet were not adjustable, the bed was thicker, and heavier.....allowing the play surface height to be correct.
One of the tables had the red brunstone that you describe. I noticed it was lighter and more brittle than slate. All 3 pieces broken while in transport. I pitched them.
 
One of the tables had the red brunstone that you describe. I noticed it was lighter and more brittle than slate. All 3 pieces broken while in transport. I pitched them.
My GCI is Brunstone, I believe it could be more brittle than slate but it would be hard for me to believe its lighter, each section of my Brunstone weighs in at 217#.
 
One of the tables had the red brunstone that you describe. I noticed it was lighter and more brittle than slate. All 3 pieces broken while in transport. I pitched them.
Your right, the bed FRAMES/Wood were thicker thus, it raised the bed to the proper ht. thx
 
My GCI is Brunstone, I believe it could be more brittle than slate but it would be hard for me to believe its lighter, each section of my Brunstone weighs in at 217#.
Good point. I didn't weigh either set so I can only say it felt lighter.
 
Back
Top