For 'free' or not for free... That is the question!
- not William Shakespeare
Here's my take -
I've spent 3 years trying to make a quality show of pool. I'm still not happy, but maybe that's just me, always seeing room for improvement. If you ask me, I think my show sucked until about a year ago..LOL.
Something's changed, I guess. I think I've learned to take more care in the product, probably because I've spent a boatload to improve it production-wise. So, the commentary tends to be more consistent and less annoying - and we highlight and pay more respect to our sponsors without being pushy or overbearing.
Another thing too, is that it's actually taken about 3 years to find people that I can put on the stream without sounding too annoying. Alot of it has to do with controlling the commentary and being a good interviewer. I've worked hard on that and still do.
Now, i can do these streams free or PPV. At this point, it really doesn't matter to me as long as we achieve several goals.
- The talent gets much deserved exposure
- The people putting in work are getting compensated
- The show can watched 5 years from now without asking, "What's this?"
With HT Sacramento's live stream - I'm afraid the only exposure those players get is LIVE exposure, with people in the chat room and posters on facebook, reminding us of who we are watching. If you were to put the finals of that event on YouTube, it would not get much play in the long term. One thing that has been crucial to my stream is the scoreboard. I finally took it upon myself to utilize a scoreboard that is ALWAYS on the screen now. Not everybody watches matches all the way through like you think they do. They like to multi-task or come back to it, keep it running in the background and come back to quickly check the score sometimes. There was no scoreboard on this last stream.
As far as the commentary / no commentary option... No solution for you yet. i have been thinking about multi-streaming on JustinTV and Ustream and/or YouTube, simultaneously (which is entirely possible) and offering the separate audio options on each different channel - But alas there are issues like bandwidth to deal with too.
Don't think that your trusty streamer is not thinking long and hard about all these issues. I will say, though - If I showed up to HT SAC with a mixer and a couple of mics and told them that I would be happy to lend them this gear for commentary, I'm sure they would have said yes. So this 'no commentary' option you speak of was not really an option for them, than it was the lack of resources to provide it. Albeit a nice, accidental experiment in show presentation, gives the viewer something to compare everything to.
I appreciate those who advocate that POV Pool is getting better and raising the bar, but I can't take full responsibility. I feel like as a final product, POV Pool merely touches the tip of the iceberg of what a real pool show can be. I think the free streams like HT Sac are fine, ONLY because there is a lot of other product out there promoting the same players (like POV, Inside Pool, Accu-Stats, Big Truck, TAR, Kevin Kidd, TVMike, NAPA Stream).
One thing that sticks out in my mind though...
- Justin Bergman was so happy to have won that tournament, he posted on Facebook, about how great this was - A milestone for his 'career' as a pool player.
Can you only imagine how he would have felt 5 years from now, as a world champion player if this event included good, professional commentary and came with a live interview afterwards?
Just food for thought. I have a habit of quieting threads, so sorry about stream of consciousness.
- Keep Loving Pool!