frankncali said:
I think Hohmann is a very good player but for people to think that he is light years ahead of other players in the sport is nonsense. No one else plays the game.
Ultimately, Frank, you're absoluely right. All we can do is measure Hohmann against his peers who play straight pool, an, as you suggest, we'd sure like more data. Still, there is a measure in straight pool called balls per inning that was, in the past, often used to compare players of different generations. Balls per inning (BPI) is points divided by innings, meaning safeties count as zero.
In his prime, Mosconi had a BPI near 15. Sigel and Greenleaf were both closer to 13, and only the truly elite had 10 or better. Sad to say I don't have the stats on Hohmann, so I can go on hearsay alone, but I'm guessing that his performance was comparable to the greatest ever, judged on BPI.
I'm somewhat more influenced by some of the comments made by straight pool legends that participated in the 2003 New Jersey Straight Pool championships. Allen Hopkins, Jim Rempe, and Dick Lane, all of them surely qualifying as "old masters" at straight pool were all in the field. Those guys said that Hohmann had played some of the greatest straight pool they'd ever seen, and that Hohmann was among the greatest straight poolers they'd ever watched. It's tough to take the comments of those guys lightly.
Still, you're right, Frank. In an era in which not enough players play 14.1, the comparisons are quite difficult to make.