The short answer is yes.As some (many) know, I'm writing a book and something happen to me this past weekend that I would want to address in said book.
It is something that has happened to me in the past but was particularly dramatic/traumatic this past weekend. I've been playing pretty good, consistent, high level for me, and then this past weekend -- for one session -- my game fell completely and totally off the cliff. Could not see the angles, could not judge CB speed accurately, and my banks went into the toilet, (sigh). My game was a wreck.
So my question is, though I know we all have our ups and down: do you occasionally walk into the PR, get into a game, and without prior warning, have your skills evaporate? Yes, I know they eventually come back. But do you occassionally suffer a fugue state in which it appears you've never played pool before?
Lou Figueroa
When I wander into the dreaded "fugue" state (for me and until this point--it may change in the future) I view the cause of this collapse as some change--intentional or unintentional--in my pre-shot routine. Does this occur because of fatigue or age as some above have suggested. Maybe, I have started wearing readers occasionally.
I find it hard to not tinker with my PSR.
I am suspicious that my tinkering or anyone's tinkering (at some point) is not wise or productive, unless it occurs because for some reason the person unwittingly entered the dreaded "fugue" state you describe. As I am writing this, I wonder if a PSR is so fragile that this can happen--someone goes into the pool hall and everything seems impossible--maybe the PSR should be altered to something more "durable" or simple? Here I go, rationalizing additional tinkering in the same paragraph wherein I assert over tinkering is, as Grady would say, "fraught with peril".
Early in my pool life I was on a search for a PSR that would allow for consistent accurate cue movement and a powerful stroke. I have come to believe this is not enough. What's required, I think, is a PSR that allows for consistent and accurate cue movement and a powerful stroke that the player uses unconsciously or very close to unconsciously such that his mind is free to worry about the game and not his PSR. Of course, if the PSR is unconscious, how do you find your way back if you get lost? I don't know.
When the best players in the world are practicing or playing, they are (for the most part) not tinkering with their PSR. All of that is over. Their PSR and all of its unique benefits and flaws are unconsciously deployed. I feel like I have seen enough of the top players play to know they are all accurate and powerful at the top level using a variety of methods (with some commonalities of course).
Currently, I have as a category of critique in my proposed PSRs for myself a category of perceived "durability". How easy or difficult is this PSR to get right? If I get down on a ball "slightly" different, does it still feel workable or is it alien and impossible? How much does it resemble (or not resemble) PSRs implemented by top players?
A couple years ago Ko Pin Chung ran something like 9 racks against Aloysius Yapp in the semi-finals of the U.S. Open on Matchroom's super microscopic pockets. It highlighted to me how precise the best players are, and it got me thinking that every day I re-make my PSR, I am frustrating a process that requires a march towards as much precision as I can muster.
I am not claiming to have the answer here. I am posing a proposed answer, and choosing to walk the walk myself. Moving forward, I have decided to incorporate what I am calling "durability" in my PSR, and I am going to try really hard to not screw around with it.
Also, it's very happy news that you started the book.
kollegedave
Last edited: