Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the no-elbow-drop thing just a theory? I mean, there is not soild undisputed proof from our reality that this no-elbow-drop stroke is the only and the best way to stroke, is it?
When I read the books from Willie Mosconi, who is without a doubt one of the greatest, he talked about dropping the elbow; when I watched Earl, who is again, another greatest, he also droped his elbow. Some players drop their elbows and some don't--where is the envidence(not assumption or theory) that not dropping your elbow would produce a better stroke?
I know some people would tell me that these guys(Willie Mosconi, Earl Strickland, Buddy Hall, Mike Davis...etc) are talented and so they can get away with flaws--however, isn't the above statement also just an assumption--an assumption made based on a theory that dropping an elbow is a flaw?
It seems that the advocates of the no-elbow-drop is using an assumption to proof a theory to be true. A rule, rather than a theory, needs to be supported by facts, not assumption.
This assumption (that some talented players have a flaw in their stroke when they drop their elbows) and this theory (that no dropping the elbow is better) are not supported by any fact as far as I know.
I would be very happy if someone could kindly show me otherwise.
Thank you.
Richard