A draw shot increases the angle off the rail (and slows the CB velocity)
A follow shot deceases the angle off the rail (and increases CB velocity)
{Where the angle is measured from the rail to the line of ingress or egress.
If you consider the angle as normal to the rail the effect is opposite.}
Just last night I an an interfering ball with my ball within 2 inches of a corner pocket.
I had line of sight to the rail 3" farther that the ideal bank line.
I hit it with significant draw, and CB backed up to the desired angle.
Say I have a cross side bank, the object ball is close to the rail and i have to hit it hard but i still need to shorten it up a bit.
I generally find side spin less accurate than draw or follow.
I assumed that since putting left and right english transfers the opposite english to the object ball, that top and bottom does the same.
It is similar in that the reflection angle changes, Spin effects are linear and take place at the rail. Draw or follow effects have a bit of arc as CB changes from the natural reflection angle. A physicist would call this a second order effect.
Which would mean that drawing the cue would put follow on the object ball, which would make it bank long or wide of its natural line. Am I correct to assume this?
Without the rail being used, the above is accurate. With the rail being used, I am not sure.