PocketPoint
Banned
If you play at one place the majority of the time, it makes sense to have a one piece cue. Just wondering if anyone has one?
If you play at one place the majority of the time, it makes sense to have a one piece cue. Just wondering if anyone has one?
If you play at one place the majority of the time, it makes sense to have a one piece cue. Just wondering if anyone has one?
If you play at one place the majority of the time, it makes sense to have a one piece cue. Just wondering if anyone has one?
I just wonder how you came on this logic? Are you one of the many misinformed people who feel that a one piece cue is the "ultimate" in playability? I've heard that fallacy for decades but if it were true, do you really think the top pros wouldn't be using one piece cues? That "wives tale" is just pure malarkey! With the modern methods of cue construction, you have much more control over the weight, balance and overall playability of a cue. It's not just about the convenience of having it in a more easily transported size. I'm not saying you can't find a one piece house cue that plays great, but if you do, it's just pure dumb luck, certainly not the norm!
WOW.....who pissed in your cheerios today?? Although I'm sure the tone of this post is probably not the reflection of you attitude....:wink:
He asked a legitimate question....I for one don't travel around with a one piece house cue but do happen to have one that plays great....It's a Valley 18 oz that I will probably have jointed sometime in the future to use.
Incidentally, I asked Steve Lomax just a week or so ago on a stream if jointing will change the playability of the cue....
But to answer the OP, yeah, some people have a cue at the pool room they normally use when they don't have their normal 2 piece with them....
Gary
Well, maybe my reply was a little blunt, but I asked a legitimate question also. I've heard that myth about one piece cues being the ultimate player cues for a long time and I believe it's pure BS. I wanted to know why he thought people would be better off with a one piece cue? No disrespect intended, I just want to dispel that idea. The only advantage to a one piece cue is that it's the cheapest thing you can buy, certainly not the best!
Well, maybe my reply was a little blunt, but I asked a legitimate question also. I've heard that myth about one piece cues being the ultimate player cues for a long time and I believe it's pure BS. I wanted to know why he thought people would be better off with a one piece cue? No disrespect intended, I just want to dispel that idea. The only advantage to a one piece cue is that it's the cheapest thing you can buy, certainly not the best!
I just wonder how you came on this logic? Are you one of the many misinformed people who feel that a one piece cue is the "ultimate" in playability? I've heard that fallacy for decades but if it were true, do you really think the top pros wouldn't be using one piece cues? That "wives tale" is just pure malarkey! With the modern methods of cue construction, you have much more control over the weight, balance and overall playability of a cue. It's not just about the convenience of having it in a more easily transported size. I'm not saying you can't find a one piece house cue that plays great, but if you do, it's just pure dumb luck, certainly not the norm!
Most snooker players use a 2 piece cue that has 1/4 and 3/4 length sections as opposed to 50/50. Obviously a pool cue is more convenient, but they still use those cues regardless. Maybe they know something we don't?
Or could it be the other way around? I think American cuemakers continue to use endless amount of materials and construction techniques in building cues. On the other hand, I haven't seen that much variety in snooker cues.
Considering that 90% or more of the materials and construction techniques used on pool cues are cosmetic...
Considering that 90% or more of the materials and construction techniques used on pool cues are cosmetic, I find that unlikely. If the snooker players didn't find an advantage in a 3/4 length shaft, why would they use it in spite of its inconvenience?
Hmmm lets see Coring.... Shaft Taper.. Adjustable Balance during construction.... those are the 3 easy ones as far as techniques I can think of.... Knowing what woods have complementary harmonics... Finding the proper joining/splicing technique... Knowing the right joint/pin material for the joint requested.... errr wait if I'm only talking about the the 10% percent that are non cosmetic... I'll quit now, but there are more..... mainly because if you list the 90% that's just glitter and glitz you will end up crashing the server... well maybe not but lets hear your 54.....
Considering that 90% or more of the materials and construction techniques used on pool cues are cosmetic, I find that unlikely. If the snooker players didn't find an advantage in a 3/4 length shaft, why would they use it in spite of its inconvenience?