how much weight?

Jude Rosenstock said:
Interesting you should bring that up, too! In the book Playing Off The Rail, I understand that Tony Annigoni's real-life games often involved some sort of weight but that wasn't explained in the book AT ALL. At least, that was the case in The Chelsea Rip chapter from what rumor has it.

Sorry, I don't mean to knock gambling. I just thought that with games of skill, weight wouldn't be an issue. Who really wants to say that, yeah, they beat that guy, but the guy gave him a spot? Doesn't that sound really weak?:confused:
 
lodini said:
Sorry, I don't mean to knock gambling. I just thought that with games of skill, weight wouldn't be an issue. Who really wants to say that, yeah, they beat that guy, but the guy gave him a spot? Doesn't that sound really weak?:confused:
It might not be so much about being better than the other guy - it might be more about winning the other guy's money.

BVal
 
Tough game!

[off small. GivingQUOTE=BPG24]I would never give anyone, even a beginner the Breaks.

There is alot more to your scenario than just the scores of those sets. In order to determine if you can spot someone you have to be able to fully gauge their overall ability. Meaning you need to define their strengths, weaknesses, and tendencies. Once you gather that info then you can decide if your ability outweighs his. If you believe that your abilities exceed his than you have to determine by how much. that is where deciding a spot comes into play.

If you aren't much better than him, than I would be hesitant to give any spot at all. If you are that much better, start him the call last two or the call 8. If you beat him easily with those spots then you can consider a free spot ball. Remember Free spot balls are bigger on a bar table than on a big table.

Don't adjust because he wants to, adjust because you feel that you can still win after gathering the correct info.

Hope this helps[/QUOTE]
Avatar hero, you sound like a really tough guy to match up with!
 
BVal said:
It might not be so much about being better than the other guy - it might be more about winning the other guy's money.

BVal
Yeah, I am getting that now... I just thought it was much more of a tough guy way to prove who was best. I was totally wrong, obviously.:(
 
Jude Rosenstock said:
Actually, it is interesting what Lodini brings up. One WOULD think that gambling was a means to find out who was the better player but it isn't. There ARE moments when this is the case. There are a few players in the area who will ask to gamble with me where I know this is NOT about the money but about finding out who is better. However, the other side of playing for money is strictly about the gamble. There is an immediate concession that one player is better than the other but that doesn't mean they still can't have an exciting match for money.
Sorry Jude, you really lost me on that one!
 
SJDinPHX said:
Sorry Jude, you really lost me on that one!


Okay. Let's say we match up and you beat me 4 sets in a row for $100 so you've won a total of $400. Now, I KNOW I can't beat you even-up but I still want to continue. What's more, you know you're better than me and still see an opportunity to make more money. There is a concession that one player is better than the other so it's not strictly about ego.

Now, there ARE scenarios where it is about ego. There are a handful of players that I play even-up ALL THE TIME. We don't ask for weight nor offer it. I can win 10 sets in a row and they will come back and play the 11th even-up.

It really depends on the history of the two players. The totum pole might also be established around a given player and how much weight he gives out. That is to say, "Oh, Joe beat you giving you the 7-ball? Well, I beat Joe and he only gave me the 8-ball!" I mean, ego can still get involved even in handicapped scenarios.
 
lodini said:
Yeah, I am getting that now... I just thought it was much more of a tough guy way to prove who was best. I was totally wrong, obviously.:(
Oops, do I detect a sign of acquiescence ?
 
if it were me and i could beat him like that id tell him he has to play for more money to get spotted that usually gets them to keep the game the same i always tell them ill get to serious for you if im giving you a spot or we end up playin for fun and they always get the table time(i dont think ive paid in like 3 years to play pool)
 
lodini said:
Sorry, I don't mean to knock gambling. I just thought that with games of skill, weight wouldn't be an issue. Who really wants to say that, yeah, they beat that guy, but the guy gave him a spot? Doesn't that sound really weak?:confused:

If Ginky wants to play me for $100 a set.... it would be like paying him $100 to rack the balls and watch. In which case, I dont think I would take that bet unless I was in the zone with $100 to burn. But if he wants to give me a huge spot, I may take the bet. But really, if he doesnt give me a spot, its almost like taking candy from a baby.
 
The Tooth strikes again!

Jude Rosenstock said:
Interesting you should bring that up, too! In the book Playing Off The Rail, I understand that Tony Annigoni's real-life games often involved some sort of weight but that wasn't explained in the book AT ALL. At least, that was the case in The Chelsea Rip chapter from what rumor has it.
Jude, as you know, the principal character in that book was "Bucktooth"
i.e. Rich Cook. The Tooth took enough weight,(spot, handicap) in most
of his gambling endeavors, to sink the entire U.S. Naval fleet.
Especially, in later years, he rarely played without having the
absolute "nuts"
 
Last edited:
SJDinPHX said:
Jude, as you know, the principal character in that book was "Bucktooth"
i.e. Rich Cook. The Tooth took on enough weight,(spot, handicap) in most
of his gambling endeavors, to sink the entire U.S. Naval fleet.


Wait, huh? Have you read the book? Tony Annigoni is the principal character.
 
Does anyone else think that the spot should not just be based on the games win/loss or how much you win, but based on how the sets were won/lost and played?

A buddy of mine played the owner of a local pool hall. I give both players the 7 but I think I can give the owner the 6. I have half of my friends bet for $50 a set. After two my buddy is up $100 but has not played well at all. The guy he is playing is running all the balls, dogging 9's, scratching late in racks. Now the owner wants the 8 ball and I don't think my friend has made buy 15 balls in two races to nine. We say no and he thinks we are being unreasonable.

Most people I play try the same thing. "you are up x sets so now you can give me one more ball". If everyone gambled this way the world would be even.
 
kryptonite9 said:
Does anyone else think that the spot should not just be based on the games win/loss or how much you win, but based on how the sets were won/lost and played?


Yes... See my post on page 1. No one else has even mentioned the many factors involved or why it matters
 
Jude Rosenstock said:
Wait, huh? Have you read the book? Tony Annigoni is the principal character.
Jude, Sorry, must have the wrong book in mind. I thought the title was
"Off The Rail". Authors name does not sound familiar either. Someone
(Jay, you would know) help me out on this.
 
SJDinPHX said:
Jude, Sorry, must have the wrong book in mind. I thought the title was
"Off The Rail". Authors name does not sound familiar either. Someone
(Jay, you would know) help me out on this.


Well, in Playing Off The Rail by David McCumber, Bucktooth IS a character. I think he makes two solid appearances where he flies to where McCumber and Annigoni are, if my memory serves correctly.
 
poolfire said:
Have a question. You play a guy on two different times, 9b, first time,two sets, race to 7 for $50. You win 7-3, 7-5. Second time you play, he wants to play race to 5 for $25. You win 5-3 and 5-4. So your in his pocket for $150. Now he wants you to give him the seven ball? I mean you win every time you play him, but its not like you rapein him. I guess my question is since I dont spot alot of people, because Im really not that good, what is the "order" of weight. Seems to me like the seven is a purdy good spot. I told him I dont think that I could win that game. I was thinking more in lines with the call eight and maybe the snaps. Feel free to enlighten me


Depends...If someone comes up to me and asks for a game and I beat them a few times and they all of a sudden want weight, I would remind them that they asked for that game...and use the line "get out with what you got in for"...

If I was the one that origonally asked for the game...I would have to adjust...but I would not go from zero gravity all the way to the 7 ball...

It looks as if the guy you played asked for the game, but on the second go round he lowerd the bet because he did not want to ask for weght, but was also not confident he was going to be able to win.

My hunch is....He is only asking for the 7 ball knowing that you will negotiate and offer him the 8-ball.

I would not offer him the 8 & the breaks...My negotiation response would have been Called 8....(takes away the break and or slop the 8 in) ...I probably would have "settled" on the wild 8 if he bocked at the called 8

Think of it as if you were the computer company Intel....You are not going to go from the quad 4 dual processer all the way up to the dual quad 8 quadrupel processor...you going to release just a little bump at a time...that way you get the other releases in between.
 
correct!

Jude Rosenstock said:
Well, in Playing Off The Rail by David McCumber, Bucktooth IS a character. I think he makes two solid appearances where he flies to where McCumber and Annigoni are, if my memory serves correctly.
Thats the book. Mc Cumber is the author. At one time he was going to
author Ronnie Allen's bio until he found out what that would entail!!!!
 
Rep For Being Multisyllablic

SJDinPHX said:
" acquiescence ?"

SJD - I'm giving you a good rep for using a word with more than two syllables:D :D !!

(That makes up for the comment about you made about me not being able to bank ha!)

H & K's

Keith
 
Last edited:
Back
Top