I know I'm going to get flamed, but I really don't care. The statement above is probably the most ironic statement I have heard. Rep stands for reputation. This is a pool forum. While I liked Smorgs post, and him, as much as anyone on here, his contribution was mainly as the 'class clown'. He added brevity to the forums. He was one of the first to turn reputation points into a game. Not something to be earned, as it used to be, but something traded for. And, so many have bought into it, that now they actually think they have a good reputation by how many points they have! Even to the extent of saying that Smorg deserves to be at the top of the reputation list when he is one of the main culprits that destroyed the reputation list!
I guess this is just typical of todays society. It's not what's actually done that counts, just how it's packaged and delivered. This forum should have guys like Blackjack, Jude Rosenstock, SJM, Steve Lipsky, Bob Jewett, and a number of others at the top of the list, as they are the ones that make this forum great. As it is, the rep list is nothing more than the rep game list.