Impossible position shot?

CharlesUFarley said:
Not sure why you would want to make it that difficult. It's natural to roll the ball two rails with a little left.
I understand you can get to point A doing two rails, but that's not the point. I wanted to see if people thought the one rail route is automatic.
 
Jude Rosenstock said:
That's not the issue. The issue is using follow. When the rail is this close, the cueball will continue to slide after contact with the object ball as it's hitting the rail. This is what makes this position play VERY difficult. You need bouncy rails and old cloth. Table conditions will play heavily on whether or not this route is possible.
BWTadpole said:
It's a stroke-testing shot. It reminds me of the shot where if you were shooting the 8 from the same position, but you wanted the cue ball to end up where the 9 is sitting. At first, you might try to blast the shot mach 10 with a lot of high inside, but you may never make it past the side pocket.

Key to the shot is a smooth stroke, hit with just enough top such that the cue ball is rolling naturally again by the time it hits the first rail. Otherwise the follow will grab after you hit the rail, and you'll end up short..
These responses (and others) are kinda what I was looking for.

I set the shot up on my table again yesterday night, and I actually was able to reach the opposite rail after four or five tries. As BWTadpole mentioned, the key is to hit the CB with enough speed (but not too much) such that it achieves natural roll by the time it contacts the first rail. To achieve this, you would have to hit it much softer than you might initially think.

As Jude mentioned, cloth/table conditions definitely play a role whether this shot is possible or not. I'm playing on 1.5 year old simonis cloth and Diamond rails, so it's a bit easier to do on my table compared to a table with brand new cloth. (Also, playing on an 8 or 7 foot table is obviously easier than a 9 footer.)

Now, try moving the 8-ball even closer at half a ball's width from the point/pocket. I know on my table, going one rail to the other is impossible to do from that distance.
 
Last edited:
For that shot to get the cue ball where you want it, you might be able to do it with high, inside English, but I think high, center spin would take you about a diamond to the left of cue ball A. Of course the easy way to do it would be to use low left English and go 3 rails to get in the vicinity of cue ball A.
 
I think that if your talking about real game situations, and not set up propositions, the 2 rail position is one that gives you the greater margin of error, simply because of the ANGLE and the fact that you are COMING INTO THE BALL/SHOT.

You can hit it with a little more confidence simply because if you end up short, you still have pretty much the same angle to the shot, regardless of if your come close to it or not.

Coming into the ball at the proper angle is SO MUCH EASIER when it comes to sound position play.

Going the one rail route, despite the fact that i think it's pretty easy, is not without it's problems.

If you manage to miss hit it and come up short, you are going to have to deal with several different cut possibilities. Errors on shots like this are amplified.

But still, the shot is pretty easy. Soft with a NICE follow through, and you're home.
 
Last edited:
I set this up last night and tried it several times. I used my usual stoke with very good results. I used a stripe ball to see different reactions with different tip placements. My best results came with hitting slightly above center just below the circle surrounding the number. Was able to scratch in the side pocket (9 ball side) with no side and my usual stroke. Seems that shooting it the same way while cutting thinner gave safer and easier results, with the CB ending around the second diamond.:thumbup:
 
I recant my earlier post. I actually tried it and it's way harder than it looks--- esp on my table. I have 760 simonis with sub 20% humidity (I keep my basement like a desert).

Based on the setup, to get within A on my table with just high and nothing else was near impossible. My CB slides and then the follow takes after contact with the rail and sticks me at the side.

When you just look at the setup - the first impression is... duh .. just HIT it. Not like following 1-rail would ever, ever, ever, be my first choice of position on this shot, but now I know I'll never do what I wouldn't have done anyways :)

Dave
 
jsp said:
I understand you can get to point A doing two rails, but that's not the point. I wanted to see if people thought the one rail route is automatic.


Is it possible yes very much so....Is it automatic....No

The thinner you can hit the OB...the easier it will be to get to point A
 
BRKNRUN said:
Is it possible yes very much so....Is it automatic....No

The thinner you can hit the OB...the easier it will be to get to point A

I think you made a valid point. Hitting the OB thinner does increase the success of this shot.

Hitting the OB thicker will cause the CB to double the rail.
 
Originally Posted by BRKNRUN
Is it possible yes very much so....Is it automatic....No

The thinner you can hit the OB...the easier it will be to get to point A



I think you made a valid point. Hitting the OB thinner does increase the success of this shot.

Hitting the OB thicker will cause the CB to double the rail.
You'd have to hit it paper thin, and the OB would have to be right on the lip of the pocket. That's not this shot.

pj
chgo
 
Patrick Johnson said:
You'd have to hit it paper thin, and the OB would have to be right on the lip of the pocket. That's not this shot.

pj
chgo

Have you tried the shot?

I tried it last night on very, very slow cloth with old worn out rails.

Hitting the OB full resulted in doubling the rail.
Hitting the OB thin resulted in success.

The side pocket is 2.5 times the size of a ball.
From the diagram, you can cheat the pocket quite a bit.
 
Back
Top