Let me explain my title question. I've been doing a lot of reading on AZ's and one-pocket's websites. I've been reading about all of those cat's who back in the day gave you hell on the tables. I've also been reading about who's out their now and how good a lot of the pros are etc.
Now this may sound really, really silly...maybe even kind of stupid, but is pocket billards skill all based around how many balls you pocket? I mean seriously think about. When you hear about John Doe pool player from across town being good or really good or whatever and he meets up Doe John from the next town, is it just based on who pocket the most balls?
I know that it depends on the game, but I feel I know some really good pool players and they'll tell you, "Yeah, I'm good, but not THAT good!". And I'm thinking, dude your the best in our league or in this bar, why can't you compete again guys on the tour or at the US Aamateurs or wherever? You pocket balls as good as anyone else.
Also, people talk about the up and coming talent in pool here in the US and internationally, saying these kids are already playing world class level pool. Is it because they can pocket as many balls as the pros? I mean, you have to know the game like you know the game, know english, position, reading the table etc. But doesn't this all boil down to making the most balls...not missing shots...any.
I'm really not sure how to ask my question where I can trully get my point across, but I'm hoping you all understand what I am asking. For example, if I can run racks like nobodies business in 9-ball and/or straights, does that mean I'm good? How about one-pocket? I mean, yes you have do know how to play very intelligently, but in the end, can you pocket 8-balls in your pocket first before your opponent. I guess I'm thinking that my thought process of being good is keeping your opponent off the table and not missing a shot.
Now this may sound really, really silly...maybe even kind of stupid, but is pocket billards skill all based around how many balls you pocket? I mean seriously think about. When you hear about John Doe pool player from across town being good or really good or whatever and he meets up Doe John from the next town, is it just based on who pocket the most balls?
I know that it depends on the game, but I feel I know some really good pool players and they'll tell you, "Yeah, I'm good, but not THAT good!". And I'm thinking, dude your the best in our league or in this bar, why can't you compete again guys on the tour or at the US Aamateurs or wherever? You pocket balls as good as anyone else.
Also, people talk about the up and coming talent in pool here in the US and internationally, saying these kids are already playing world class level pool. Is it because they can pocket as many balls as the pros? I mean, you have to know the game like you know the game, know english, position, reading the table etc. But doesn't this all boil down to making the most balls...not missing shots...any.
I'm really not sure how to ask my question where I can trully get my point across, but I'm hoping you all understand what I am asking. For example, if I can run racks like nobodies business in 9-ball and/or straights, does that mean I'm good? How about one-pocket? I mean, yes you have do know how to play very intelligently, but in the end, can you pocket 8-balls in your pocket first before your opponent. I guess I'm thinking that my thought process of being good is keeping your opponent off the table and not missing a shot.
Last edited: