I have noticed that the IPT has done a decent job scheduling the matches such that the players of the same country face each other first (or at least very early) in a given round. This is to avoid any "business" that can take place if they meet late in the round.
For example, Reyes and Pagulayan played each other first today. Same with Engert and Ortmann. I also recall Parica and Orcullo playing each other first in yesterday's round, as well Engert playing Michael Schmidt. Scheduling the matchups this way is just a good idea.
However...the IPT is INCONSISTENT when dealing with the American players in the same group. For the last two days, there have been and are cases where American players play each other LAST.
For example, I'm sure I'm not the only one that noticed Morris and Williams playing each other for the last match of yesterday's round. Coming into that last match, Williams was undefeated and guaranteed a spot into the next round. Morris could only make it through if he beats Williams. Morris ended winning that match, guaranteeing him a spot through the next round.
Today, Williams is playing Harriman and Morris is facing Deuel for the last matches of the day. The Williams/Harriman match is inconsequential, but not so for the Deuel/Morris match. Morris is guaranteed to move through to the next round, but Deuel has to win his match in order to stay alive (Busta would also have to lose his match).
I'm not implying in any way that there has been or will be any "business" or "dealings" going on with the American players...but i'm sure lots of the other players will probably speculate depending on a particular outcome. Why wouldn't the IPT avoid these situations involving American players? It is surely obvious the IPT has avoided these situations with Germany and the Philippines...why not so for the US? The IPT should be consistent regarding this.
For example, Reyes and Pagulayan played each other first today. Same with Engert and Ortmann. I also recall Parica and Orcullo playing each other first in yesterday's round, as well Engert playing Michael Schmidt. Scheduling the matchups this way is just a good idea.
However...the IPT is INCONSISTENT when dealing with the American players in the same group. For the last two days, there have been and are cases where American players play each other LAST.
For example, I'm sure I'm not the only one that noticed Morris and Williams playing each other for the last match of yesterday's round. Coming into that last match, Williams was undefeated and guaranteed a spot into the next round. Morris could only make it through if he beats Williams. Morris ended winning that match, guaranteeing him a spot through the next round.
Today, Williams is playing Harriman and Morris is facing Deuel for the last matches of the day. The Williams/Harriman match is inconsequential, but not so for the Deuel/Morris match. Morris is guaranteed to move through to the next round, but Deuel has to win his match in order to stay alive (Busta would also have to lose his match).
I'm not implying in any way that there has been or will be any "business" or "dealings" going on with the American players...but i'm sure lots of the other players will probably speculate depending on a particular outcome. Why wouldn't the IPT avoid these situations involving American players? It is surely obvious the IPT has avoided these situations with Germany and the Philippines...why not so for the US? The IPT should be consistent regarding this.