The world would be a far better place if people worried about themselves instead of sticking their noses in other's business. JMHO.
But somehow your thoughts are OK...?
High-larious!
The world would be a far better place if people worried about themselves instead of sticking their noses in other's business. JMHO.
For the record many of us were not commenting on any potential worker comp fraud but instead reacting to the poster who was saying eveeryone should stand by while someone defrauds others (in other words not their business). In this case no one has enough information about where this particular pool player stands on the scale of justice.
The world would be a far better place if people worried about themselves instead of sticking their noses in other's business. JMHO.
Disability is an issue that is fraught with circumstance. There are many people who appear to be healthy but have debilitating problems that will not let them perform a normal 40-hour a week job. I do not think that those who defraud the system are anything less than criminals. I do think that people who have no information outside a magazine article should keep their uninformed opinions to themselves. I have not read the article in question, nor do I know who the player is. I don't like to see anyone blasted without all the facts in place, and I seriously doubt that any employer pays a disabled employee $5000 a month out of his own pocket. If you really think this individual is receiving benefits unjustly, then do what you have already done, (rat him out) but to the proper authorities. Otherwise, MYOB.
Black-Balled is right and every single one of you should be pissed off at this guy for taking advantage. My wife has a legitimate workman's comp injury and they spend their time harrassing her because of clowns like this. Pray you never have to file for workman's comp, the honest guy ends up getting screwed. If this guy is double dipping, I hope they nail his ass.
Self-insured companies...have a greater amount of control over how the claim proceeds.
"Sort of...but they still must operate within the context of their WC provisions...and it behooves both employer and injured worker to know the law."
...If they have 30 days to send out an appeal, you can bet they will wait until the 30th day. Appears to be on the correct side of the law, no?
Sometimes they will postmark the envelope with the 30th day and hold off on mailing it for another week. It simply buys them more time. That is a foolish practice and you can bet neither I nor my carrier would risk the Commission's eye for what little time it would buy.
...They do this to everyone. Everyone must be treated equally-and legally- nio?
The truly injured worker justs wants to get better. I believe that is true in most cases
So when I see someone steal your car, I won't stick my nose in your business and I will make the world a better place. Right?
If this guy is legit, nothing will happen to him. He will be checked out and he will continue to receive his W/C. No one says you have to be dead to receive W/C.
If this guy is collecting W/C and not disabled, he is taking money out of your pocket just like a guy stealing your car.
You just don't get it, do you?
Reality fail, people!
People are out there collecting money from taxpayers and companies in fraudulent ways. Just because there is no person to person 'robbery' evident doesn't mean it isn't a scam, immoral and yes, illegal.
Those of you who might jump all over a company that wrongs someone, stating the company owes $...there is a flip side to that: the company surely does not owe those who have no claim/ right.
And let us not fail to consider how the info likely got out: the dude told someone himself!
In most cases, yes. Ask any injured worker. Most just want to get back to the way things were before the injury.
http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/..._body_ok_mike_city_was_7dMtBjW3esGUwFqrlXV1OI
Of corpse it's OK
By LORENA MONGELLI, REBECCA ROSENBERG and CHUCK BENNETT
Last Updated: 10:09 AM, March 31, 2011
Posted: 2:06 AM, March 31, 2011
Mayor Bloomberg insisted yesterday that city morgue workers had every right to seize the body of an NYPD cop from a funeral home and expunge references to 9/11 toxins from his death certificate.
"The bottom line is that if the law requires, for nonnatural causes, to do an investigation, that's what it's going to be . . . I'm sorry that anybody felt upset about it," Bloomberg said.
Relatives of cancer-stricken retired Officer George Wong held a belated funeral yesterday, saying they still hadn't heard directly from city officials apologizing for having plucked the officer's body from the Ng Fook funeral home Monday night.
"I was really upset. They took the body again to cut it or whatever," Wong's mother, Mei Sin Wong, 73, said through an interpreter. "It's not respectful for the Chinese people."
Wong's brother, Howard, 40, said he hadn't heard a peep of an apology.
"I welcome apologies, but if they wanted to apologize they had yesterday to apologize, or the day before or any other day but they didn't," he said. "They have my phone number if they want to contact me."
George Wong died last Thursday at age 48 of gastric cancer, and his hospice doctor wrote that the cancer was related to Wong's time at Ground Zero
The finding raised flags at the Department of Health, as official city policy does not acknowledge that exposure to Ground Zero dust is linked to "emerging illnesses, including cancer."
The family refused to allow an autopsy to go forward, but city coroners conducted an "external examination" that gave it legal authority to change the official cause of death to "pending."
George Wong "was there directing trucks with all the debris," said his former partner in the Fifth Precinct, retired cop Franklin Cosom. "He didn't have any mask or anything."
Six cops carried Wong's American-flag-draped coffin to a hearse en route to cremation. A truck held his official NYPD portrait and his badge number 3254 in flowers.
Other city officials said the medical examiner erred.
"We all know Officer Wong died from a disease related to
9/11," said City Councilwoman Margaret Chin (D-Manhattan). "I don't understand why the city would do something so disrespectful."
Additional reporting by David Seifman
lorena.mongelli@nypost.com