George seems to think so at around the 6:20 mark.
Billiards? Not so much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSJRIKuNJBA
Billiards? Not so much.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSJRIKuNJBA
It's a "game of skill" but it is not a sport.......and certainly then darts aren't a sport either IMO....both are games involving skills but nonetheless are basically games.......and stamina, etc. required for long matches & tournaments doesn't qualify nor promote pool to the level of being considered a sport........I really would like to think otherwise but then one could argue and reason Poker qualifies as a sport.......what about marathon chess tournaments? Lots of physical endurance, skills, etc.are needed to win those type tournaments.......Nope, just some more, albeit different, games.
I think of it as being on a spectrum. On one end of the spectrum you have "Pure Games", things like chess, checkers, poker. "Pure Games" require absolutely no physical skill to play, chess can be played without limbs and even sight as an example.
On the other end of the spectrum you have "Pure Sports", things like gymnastics and figure skating. This end of the spectrum requires absolute physical skill, they are such pure sports that the only way to score it is to be judged.
"Pure Games" require superior strategy, but "Pure Sports" require very little if any strategy. Golf and pool are good examples of how these things are rated in my mind. Pool requires much more strategy than golf, but the stroke in pool is much less difficult to master than the golf stroke. In that example, golf is more of a sport than pool. But pool is more of a game than golf. They both exist on the same spectrum, pool being somewhere in the middle. Being in the middle of this spectrum is why I think it may be one of the greatest inventions ever.:thumbup: