monski said:nice trim weight of 19.2 ounces
JimBo said:Looks like he learned a lot from Edwin.
Jim
--------------------JimBo said:Looks like he learned a lot from Edwin.
Jim
---------deadstroke32 said:Now that is a lovely cue
monski said:--------------------
The design, I worked on and discussed with Tony (So I hope I get a pinch of the credit too... hehehe...).
Well if you were also the one who picked out the woods I'd guess you get part of the blame. I enjoy the cue and can see some potential, but there is no contrast, those boxes kinda get lost in the cue IMO, yet I still like that it's not your normal 6-8 point knockoff.
Tony has a lot of respect from Edwin and some other guys he's wroked with. No doubt about that.
JimBo said:Well if you were also the one who picked out the woods I'd guess you get part of the blame. I enjoy the cue and can see some potential, but there is no contrast, those boxes kinda get lost in the cue IMO, yet I still like that it's not your normal 6-8 point knockoff.
Jim
JimBo said:Well it's clear it's one of the many over there who try to live off Edwin's good name, but it's also clear it's not Edwin's work. I meant what I said when I said it was clear that it was influenced by him. One thing seems to stand out though the quality doesn't seem to translate, many of the Filipino makers try to make very elaborate cues but Edwin seems to be the only ones that hold up over time. Since you seem to like to find the "new" cuemaker their can you tell me why we don't see any of them just building a solid plain SW style cue? one that just plays good and isn't all about flash? I mean every cue that I see seems to have 400 ivory inlays.
Jim
monski said:Did not say that its Edwin's work. I did not make any reference to Edwin. You were the one who mentioned him. Anyway, I guess if you worked with someone who has influenced you, it will be reflected in your work right? At the same time Tony says he has different cue building style from Edwin. I think Tony will also say that he does not use Edwin's name. Interested parties can clarify with Tony direct on his cellphone (63916-6806823) as I can't answer for him.
I find your comments interesting, why would he not use Edwin's name if he worked with him? I'm not sure how you took my comments, they were not insulting I meant them more as a compliment to someone who's work I respect. Yet you seem to be replying like if this guy is linked to Edwin it's an insult?? I am not sure I am understanding you. If I worked with a well respected master I think I would name drop as often as I could, can you shed light as to why you say he wouldn't mention his name? how long did he study under Edwin? BTW when I wrote the original post I was unaware that this person did work with Ed, just mentioning that I could see Ed's influence, I wasn't sure if it was the maker or the designer (you) who brought in that element. Also as I've said already seems many of the makers there (other then Edwin pump out sub par cues in the way of materials and workmanship, again makes me wonder why this person would go out of the way to distance himself from someone who seems to have a good reputation? To make myself clear, I have no idea who this Tony is, or what his last name is, although I 1/2 ass remember you posting a name on some conversions you had made a few months back, I assume it's the same guy?
On elaborate filipino cues: Tony and other cue makers make simpler cues. Tony even has a price list for plain and simple cues. I can send this list to anyone who would like to know his pricing scheme. I am in fact asking Tony to build me 2 (1 might be of kingwood and the other olive burl) simple cues that I can just leave in the pool hall I frequent. Anyway I think there is a tendency for filipino cue makers to be elaborate. They do this imo to put in additional value to the cue since they put little value to their labor and materials. Hence it becomes a contest on who has more materials... specially if they are selling to middle class youngsters and newbie pool players who just wanna make an impression. The better makers are different as they put time time into the structure, sealing and finish of the cue. Hence their pricing scheme is also higher. In truth, I see a lot of simpler cues in pool halls over here.
JimBo said:I find your comments interesting, why would he not use Edwin's name if he worked with him? I'm not sure how you took my comments, they were not insulting I meant them more as a compliment to someone who's work I respect.
JimBo said:Yet you seem to be replying like if this guy is linked to Edwin it's an insult?? I am not sure I am understanding you. If I worked with a well respected master I think I would name drop as often as I could, can you shed light as to why you say he wouldn't mention his name? how long did he study under Edwin?
JimBo said:BTW when I wrote the original post I was unaware that this person did work with Ed, just mentioning that I could see Ed's influence, I wasn't sure if it was the maker or the designer (you) who brought in that element. Also as I've said already seems many of the makers there (other then Edwin pump out sub par cues in the way of materials and workmanship, again makes me wonder why this person would go out of the way to distance himself from someone who seems to have a good reputation?
JimBo said:To make myself clear, I have no idea who this Tony is, or what his last name is, although I 1/2 ass remember you posting a name on some conversions you had made a few months back, I assume it's the same guy?
Jim
JimBo said:Well again I didn't mean disrespect from my comments, it's just something I've always noticed when I see cues by Linds, or Cueperfect, and your guy there as well as from Edwin, and what I've always found odd about it is that your country is known for the best players and the best from there has always played with the plainest of cues (the Judd) I just think it odd that the market would lend itself to fancy looks rather then a plain great hitting cue.
monski said:took some pics of the cue under normal daylight. Maybe this will turn out better than previous pics. Twas a cloudy day though.
monski said:No. Tony has respect for Edwin as I said. Its just the circumstance. When Tony decided to be on his own, Edwin talked to Tony that his Japanese partner got worried that Edwin's system will be used by Tony and enter the Japanese market. Tony assured Edwin that this won't happen as he is developing a system of his own. So its because of this that Tony tries to avoid the subject when it is mentioned and he wants people to see his work as a Tony Bautista work. Am not sure how long Tony and the other guys were employed under Edwin.
Pardon me for butting in but this paragraph is somewhat incomplete as per Master Bandido. Master Bandido demanded by presenting Patent papers to ensure his system will not be used to enter the Japanese market. I'm not sure why the Japanese market entry was drag into this coz we can just say that we respect the Master...period...all's well that ends well. Pls take note that a weak information might trigger wrong signals mostly to the name involved who also reads these posts but can't reply. Lets be more careful the next time around...
Thank you very much...
Allan