Jazz-Window Vines: My christmas gift to me...

monski

sweet & pretty
Silver Member
I like this gift I gave to me...
 

Attachments

  • WV.jpg
    WV.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 516
window design with scrimmed vines on ivory
 

Attachments

  • WVButt2.jpg
    WVButt2.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 512
bloodwood nose and ebony butt sleeve
 

Attachments

  • WVfront2.jpg
    WVfront2.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 523
JimBo said:
Looks like he learned a lot from Edwin.

Jim
--------------------
The design, I worked on and discussed with Tony (So I hope I get a pinch of the credit too... hehehe...).

Tony has a lot of respect from Edwin and some other guys he's wroked with. No doubt about that.
 
monski said:
--------------------
The design, I worked on and discussed with Tony (So I hope I get a pinch of the credit too... hehehe...).

Well if you were also the one who picked out the woods I'd guess you get part of the blame. I enjoy the cue and can see some potential, but there is no contrast, those boxes kinda get lost in the cue IMO, yet I still like that it's not your normal 6-8 point knockoff.

Tony has a lot of respect from Edwin and some other guys he's wroked with. No doubt about that.

Well it's clear it's one of the many over there who try to live off Edwin's good name, but it's also clear it's not Edwin's work. I meant what I said when I said it was clear that it was influenced by him. One thing seems to stand out though the quality doesn't seem to translate, many of the Filipino makers try to make very elaborate cues but Edwin seems to be the only ones that hold up over time. Since you seem to like to find the "new" cuemaker their can you tell me why we don't see any of them just building a solid plain SW style cue? one that just plays good and isn't all about flash? I mean every cue that I see seems to have 400 ivory inlays.

Jim
 
JimBo said:
Well if you were also the one who picked out the woods I'd guess you get part of the blame. I enjoy the cue and can see some potential, but there is no contrast, those boxes kinda get lost in the cue IMO, yet I still like that it's not your normal 6-8 point knockoff.
Jim

Hi, the cue is much prettier in person. The pic is kinda dark coz I took in in poor lighting. The contrast is there. Just wasn't able to have it come out on the pic. I'm glad you see potential. Its not a "normal knock off" as you said. I tried to come up with a nice original concept as best I could but I am not exposed to as many cues as you or the others here. Based on your post it seems that its still somewhat of a knock off. I hope I can be more original on the next cue that's currently in the works. Thanks


JimBo said:
Well it's clear it's one of the many over there who try to live off Edwin's good name, but it's also clear it's not Edwin's work. I meant what I said when I said it was clear that it was influenced by him. One thing seems to stand out though the quality doesn't seem to translate, many of the Filipino makers try to make very elaborate cues but Edwin seems to be the only ones that hold up over time. Since you seem to like to find the "new" cuemaker their can you tell me why we don't see any of them just building a solid plain SW style cue? one that just plays good and isn't all about flash? I mean every cue that I see seems to have 400 ivory inlays.

Jim

Did not say that its Edwin's work. I did not make any reference to Edwin. You were the one who mentioned him. Anyway, I guess if you worked with someone who has influenced you, it will be reflected in your work right? At the same time Tony says he has different cue building style from Edwin. I think Tony will also say that he does not use Edwin's name. Interested parties can clarify with Tony direct on his cellphone (63916-6806823) as I can't answer for him.

On elaborate filipino cues: Tony and other cue makers make simpler cues. Tony even has a price list for plain and simple cues. I can send this list to anyone who would like to know his pricing scheme. I am in fact asking Tony to build me 2 (1 might be of kingwood and the other olive burl) simple cues that I can just leave in the pool hall I frequent. Anyway I think there is a tendency for filipino cue makers to be elaborate. They do this imo to put in additional value to the cue since they put little value to their labor and materials. Hence it becomes a contest on who has more materials... specially if they are selling to middle class youngsters and newbie pool players who just wanna make an impression. The better makers are different as they put time time into the structure, sealing and finish of the cue. Hence their pricing scheme is also higher. In truth, I see a lot of simpler cues in pool halls over here.
 
Last edited:
monski said:
Did not say that its Edwin's work. I did not make any reference to Edwin. You were the one who mentioned him. Anyway, I guess if you worked with someone who has influenced you, it will be reflected in your work right? At the same time Tony says he has different cue building style from Edwin. I think Tony will also say that he does not use Edwin's name. Interested parties can clarify with Tony direct on his cellphone (63916-6806823) as I can't answer for him.

I find your comments interesting, why would he not use Edwin's name if he worked with him? I'm not sure how you took my comments, they were not insulting I meant them more as a compliment to someone who's work I respect. Yet you seem to be replying like if this guy is linked to Edwin it's an insult?? I am not sure I am understanding you. If I worked with a well respected master I think I would name drop as often as I could, can you shed light as to why you say he wouldn't mention his name? how long did he study under Edwin? BTW when I wrote the original post I was unaware that this person did work with Ed, just mentioning that I could see Ed's influence, I wasn't sure if it was the maker or the designer (you) who brought in that element. Also as I've said already seems many of the makers there (other then Edwin pump out sub par cues in the way of materials and workmanship, again makes me wonder why this person would go out of the way to distance himself from someone who seems to have a good reputation? To make myself clear, I have no idea who this Tony is, or what his last name is, although I 1/2 ass remember you posting a name on some conversions you had made a few months back, I assume it's the same guy?

On elaborate filipino cues: Tony and other cue makers make simpler cues. Tony even has a price list for plain and simple cues. I can send this list to anyone who would like to know his pricing scheme. I am in fact asking Tony to build me 2 (1 might be of kingwood and the other olive burl) simple cues that I can just leave in the pool hall I frequent. Anyway I think there is a tendency for filipino cue makers to be elaborate. They do this imo to put in additional value to the cue since they put little value to their labor and materials. Hence it becomes a contest on who has more materials... specially if they are selling to middle class youngsters and newbie pool players who just wanna make an impression. The better makers are different as they put time time into the structure, sealing and finish of the cue. Hence their pricing scheme is also higher. In truth, I see a lot of simpler cues in pool halls over here.

Well again I didn't mean disrespect from my comments, it's just something I've always noticed when I see cues by Linds, or Cueperfect, and your guy there as well as from Edwin, and what I've always found odd about it is that your country is known for the best players and the best from there has always played with the plainest of cues (the Judd) I just think it odd that the market would lend itself to fancy looks rather then a plain great hitting cue. Over here all the kids want to wear what Jordan wears or use the glove that Jeter plays with, plain or fancy it's all about what the stars use, I would think I'd see more plain jane Efren style cues being made and sold there. Also the market for Phillipeno cues in the USA is very weak and if you're trying to sell in a country with a bad economy I would think low end would pay the bills?? What do I know?

Jim
 
JimBo said:
I find your comments interesting, why would he not use Edwin's name if he worked with him? I'm not sure how you took my comments, they were not insulting I meant them more as a compliment to someone who's work I respect.

I just tried to answer as simply as I could. I'm glad you respect the work. I'm sure he'd appreciate it. "Living off Edwin's name" as you stated could be taken differently. Anyway, from what I know Tony promised Edwin that he will not use Edwin's system or name in any sort of marketing.

JimBo said:
Yet you seem to be replying like if this guy is linked to Edwin it's an insult?? I am not sure I am understanding you. If I worked with a well respected master I think I would name drop as often as I could, can you shed light as to why you say he wouldn't mention his name? how long did he study under Edwin?

No. Tony has respect for Edwin as I said. Its just the circumstance. When Tony decided to be on his own, Edwin talked to Tony that his Japanese partner got worried that Edwin's system will be used by Tony and enter the Japanese market. Tony assured Edwin that this won't happen as he is developing a system of his own. So its because of this that Tony tries to avoid the subject when it is mentioned and he wants people to see his work as a Tony Bautista work. Am not sure how long Tony and the other guys were employed under Edwin.

JimBo said:
BTW when I wrote the original post I was unaware that this person did work with Ed, just mentioning that I could see Ed's influence, I wasn't sure if it was the maker or the designer (you) who brought in that element. Also as I've said already seems many of the makers there (other then Edwin pump out sub par cues in the way of materials and workmanship, again makes me wonder why this person would go out of the way to distance himself from someone who seems to have a good reputation?

Many makers here turn out cues that are sub par and I have stated my theory on that. They put out fancy cues because labor and materials here are relatively cheaper than other places. But the cue ultimately suffers as the preparations required to make a nice hitting and long lasting cue are compromised for the quick buck. The better ones (cuemakers) really know better.


JimBo said:
To make myself clear, I have no idea who this Tony is, or what his last name is, although I 1/2 ass remember you posting a name on some conversions you had made a few months back, I assume it's the same guy?
Jim

Cant remember the exact situation but I have mentioned his name before.

JimBo said:
Well again I didn't mean disrespect from my comments, it's just something I've always noticed when I see cues by Linds, or Cueperfect, and your guy there as well as from Edwin, and what I've always found odd about it is that your country is known for the best players and the best from there has always played with the plainest of cues (the Judd) I just think it odd that the market would lend itself to fancy looks rather then a plain great hitting cue.

No offense taken. Actually the best players here don't mind aesthetics that much. As I said since things are relatively cheaper, the casual player or newbie just gives in to the tempatation. Overall, many people here like to show off stuff if they can afford to.

Over here all the kids want to wear what Jordan wears or use the glove that Jeter plays with, plain or fancy it's all about what the stars use, I would think I'd see more plain jane Efren style cues being made and sold there. Also the market for Phillipeno cues in the USA is very weak and if you're trying to sell in a country with a bad economy I would think low end would pay the bills?? What do I know?[/QUOTE]

Jim[/COLOR][/B][/QUOTE]

Yes. We are a market that is very much driven by advertisements. Did you know that we are considered the Billboard country? I'm not trying to sell my Window Vines Cue there. Its my christmas gift to me. Just posting it in the cue gallery.
 
Last edited:
took some pics of the cue under normal daylight. Maybe this will turn out better than previous pics. Twas a cloudy day though.
 

Attachments

  • Collage.jpg
    Collage.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 317
monski said:
took some pics of the cue under normal daylight. Maybe this will turn out better than previous pics. Twas a cloudy day though.

hello Monski

now that better, very nice cue. IMO, i think if the forearm is Ebony it will make the window stand out more. overall very nice X-Mas gift for yourself. enjoy the beauty.

wawacue
 
Cue ...

I like that cue a lot. Very nice, and I love the
forearm. I am not big on black/white combos or
dark brown/white combos that look too contrasty
to me. Your woods in the forearm appeal to me
a lot.
 
monski said:
No. Tony has respect for Edwin as I said. Its just the circumstance. When Tony decided to be on his own, Edwin talked to Tony that his Japanese partner got worried that Edwin's system will be used by Tony and enter the Japanese market. Tony assured Edwin that this won't happen as he is developing a system of his own. So its because of this that Tony tries to avoid the subject when it is mentioned and he wants people to see his work as a Tony Bautista work. Am not sure how long Tony and the other guys were employed under Edwin.


Pardon me for butting in but this paragraph is somewhat incomplete as per Master Bandido. Master Bandido demanded by presenting Patent papers to ensure his system will not be used to enter the Japanese market. I'm not sure why the Japanese market entry was drag into this coz we can just say that we respect the Master...period...all's well that ends well. Pls take note that a weak information might trigger wrong signals mostly to the name involved who also reads these posts but can't reply. Lets be more careful the next time around...

Thank you very much...
Allan
 
Back
Top