asiasdad said:TAP TAP TAP....I wish there was more of these type posts and much less az kissing on here...I'd give you more rep if I didn't have to spread it around more first.
Thanks Danny, but there are some who will say that we "don't get it". After looking at that trio of Schicks that HighEndCues is offering, it reminds me that for a lot of people it is more about the cues being a piece of art than something you take down to the pool hall and leave at the table when you go the restroom without fear (or much fear, anyway). It's admirable what those cuemakers are doing, but I don't blame other cuemakers for not wanting to get into that - perhaps concentrating less on fancy inlay-work and designs and spending more time on playability, has had something to do with the superb playability reputation of Sugartrees and Zylrs? I would add Tucker to that list, but he has been venturing into more creative designs and veneered full-splice cues.
I get it - no doubt, Schick, Ginacues, Black Boar and ilk have got their designs and inlays down to the millimicrometer, and that is admirable. It's all personal taste, but if I had the money to buy one (and I don't), I would spend it on something else. Same reason I'd buy a Mustang over a Ferrari.
Personally, my favorite designs are the Gus Szamboti's and Balabushkas, but to get one that truly illustrates their design work, it just costs more than I'm willing to spend. Jerry has gotten creative with designs throughout his career, but yes, now he sticks more to traditional designs - http://webpages.charter.net/rauenzahncue/. Because my tastes lean toward Gus's and Bushkas, I like - R - cues, traditional-looking Scruggs and Motteys, and Titlist conversions (but not the wild modern-looking ones). I play with a traditional-looking 4-veneered Tucker. It's all personal taste. Why knock Jerry because he is satisfying a market for traditional-looking cues that play great and are affordable?