watchez said:
John...First try not to use words you don't know how to spell. Secondly, answer this honestly. Did Fury use a picture of a Sledgehammer in one of their ads for a Fury break cue because they look almost exactly the same? Remember, answer honestly---this will help me determine if from your character you are worth having a conversation with. Oh, and don't worry about if Mike appreciates what I am doing. Maybe you should concentrate on how do you think he feels about the fact that Fury exactly imitated his idea? I think the fact that a patent is pending answers that question.
Ok, I'll try not to misspell words I know how to use. You should try and understand the words rather than nitpicking the spelling. May I suggest you try and stick to concepts you understand?
No, Fury has never used any Sledgehammer pictures for anything. I would also like to suggest that you may want to get your eyes checked if you think that the Fury Jump Break "looks almost exactly the same" as the Sledgehammer. The design of both cues is very different. And in my opinion, the Fury is much nicer looking. But beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I have seen soem very nice custom Sledgehammers.
Since you told me to be honest would you care to bet some money on my answer above? How about the small sum of $1000 dollars that we have never used a picture of a Sledgehammer in any advertisement? I'll donate $500 of my winnings towards your education and new glasses.
I don't worry about what Mike thinks about what you are doing. I just thought you might want to ask him since you are apparently trying to speak for him. Your accusations are without merit and easily disproven.
Fury took nothing from Mike Gulyassy. The phenolic capped shaft has been around for 20 years. Just because Mike started advertising it and has a patent pending does not mean that he invented it. Furthermore, nothing in our ads suggests that the materials or construction is the same or similar to the Sledgehammer. The only real similarity between Mike's descriptions on his website and the Fury ads is that they are both jump/break cues.
Are you going to say that Mike invented phenolic resin? Was he the first to put it on the end of a cue for a jump/break cue? Did he invent the jump/break cue? Of course the answer to all that is no. Do you see me crying because everyone ripped off the Bunjee Jumper? How about because everyone ripped off the Instroke case? No. My answer to both of those situations was to invite consumers to test the products for themselves. Neither the Bunjee nor the Instroke was ever beaten in their respective categories on performance and value.
So, how about you just put up or shut up? Put you money where your mouth is and then you can come in here and claim to sell "the best". Otherwise, without proof you are just another blowhard with an ignorant opinon.
Lastly, I am just a sucker for the underprivileged, I will give you a quick lesson in intellectual property matters. A product in patent pending status is not protected from infringement. Patent Pending means that a patent has been applied for not that it has been granted. Even after a patent has been granted it still must be proven that other products infringe upon it to have any grounds. This is all stuff you could easily find on the internet if you cared to educate yourself rather than making stupid accussations.
John
P.S. please spellcheck this for me would you?