Jesus Christ!! Shoot the %€~<¥€* ball.
I’m watching Oi and Max and damn near fell asleep. The balls aren’t moving!!
I’m watching Oi and Max and damn near fell asleep. The balls aren’t moving!!
They are playing 9 ball!One Pocket can be slow game, don't play if you want fast game.
As long as I'm in the right mood I don't mind a slower 1P match. I have to be in the mind state of learning and analyzing. Sometimes the extra time lets you think of what your move would be. You can kind of do the same thing on any pre recorded match. Pause it and think of all the shot options, then unpause and see what the player decided to do. It's definitely a different feel than just watching a match and especially with a shot clock the players might not have the luxury of deciding which of 5 options would be best. Most good players analyze quickly, but it's fun to think of the options.It's interesting that some games don't require the shot clock. Snooker is the same way, no shot clock.
Me personally, when I'm sweating a one pocket match in person, on-site, I don't care how long a shot takes. But watching a one pocket game virtually, I can see how it would take away from the thrill and be boring as heck.
Many moons ago, ESPN came to the Capital City Classic in Maryland, and during the one pocket division, a one pocket match between two veterans of the game took so long, they packed up their gear and left.
My viewpoint, he used to think that ay, but now with his game paying all expenses he made himself slow down. On the other hand, I've noticed Shane speeding up with his shortened cue.Funny thing is Oi is one usually of the faster players
I dont doubt that. Some of these races to 3 are stretching well over 2 hours.It's interesting that some games don't require the shot clock. Snooker is the same way, no shot clock.
Me personally, when I'm sweating a one pocket match in person, on-site, I don't care how long a shot takes. But watching a one pocket game virtually, I can see how it would take away from the thrill and be boring as heck.
Many moons ago, ESPN came to the Capital City Classic in Maryland, and during the one pocket division, a one pocket match between two veterans of the game took so long, they packed up their gear and left.
Yeah, that's terrible. I kinda like the 30 second shot clock Matchroom has now, but sometimes I think that is too short. Im thinking 45sec is probably best.They are playing 9 ball!
Well said.Said it before and I'll say it again. If you won't watch (or play) without a shot clock then you don't understand the game. You are not the only player and not the only observer.
I totally get the reasons for shot clocks, especially when it's on TV. And I'm fine with it. What I'll never understand though is how "pool fans" moan about the lack of a shot clock. Channel hoppers yes, but pool fans no. You are not the only player and not the only observer.
The fact that seven and eight hundred fargos take their time when there is no shot clock tells us something. You are not the only player and not the only obsever.
Shot clocks for TV? Yes it makes sense and 30s is ok, maybe 40s is better, maybe. Shot clocks because pool players are bored watching? You are not the only player and not the only observer.
Maybe go watch bar rules "no pussy shots" rules and start a fight. Or maybe don't and actually love the game.
Thats whats nice about watching pre-recorded matches on YouTube, tap the right arrow key and it skips ahead 6 seconds for every tap, its like having your own shot clock!!!!!It's interesting that some games don't require the shot clock. Snooker is the same way, no shot clock.
Me personally, when I'm sweating a one pocket match in person, on-site, I don't care how long a shot takes. But watching a one pocket game virtually, I can see how it would take away from the thrill and be boring as heck.
Many moons ago, ESPN came to the Capital City Classic in Maryland, and during the one pocket division, a one pocket match between two veterans of the game took so long, they packed up their gear and left.