tsw_521 said:I would never consider Lasik in my current situation. The risks are too great IMO. I can get to about 20/20 or 20/25 with contacts, which is enough to play reasonably well and experience a normal daily life.
The long-term effects of Lasik are unknown. In the short term, there are reports of between 3% and 5% of Lasik patients experiencing *unresolved* vision complaints six months following surgery. These include halos, starbursts, night blindness, excessive dry eye, etc. The true rate could be higher. Also, there's no going back if the surgery doesn't work out.
As for me, my vision is fine with contacts, and there's no chance in hell I would roll the dice for a 1/20 chance of permanent vision loss just to save the inconvenience of wearing contacts. In fact, there are only two situations in which I'd recommend a surgical procedure like this:
1) if the person's livelihood depends on perfect vision, such as a *professional* pool player or other professional athlete, or
2) if the person has such difficulty seeing that the risk of permanent vision damage is outweighed by the benefit of greatly improved vision.
Going from 20/25 to 20/15, for me, is entirely not worth the risk.
Select Lasik complication reports:
http://home.arcor.de/pinnipedii/poppayette.pdf
http://www.usaeyes.org/lasik/faq/lasik-complications.htm
I couldn't agree more.
I've worn contacts for about 20 years now. I can see just fine and play pool just fine. I have stumbled through the door at 2am, so hammered I had to crawl up the stairs to keep from falling, and still managed to get my contacts out and into the little dish. Anything that I can accomplish while being that wasted is not enough of an inconvenience to risk my vision to avoid.
Pool is something that I love to do, but I don't have the talent, attitude, or mental toughness to make a living at it as a pro or gambler. So, even if the surgery was guaranteed to improve my game, I still wouldn't do it. Others of course, might make different decisions or be in different circumstances.