damn some of those set ups look like billiard cue assault rifles
that REVO black is workin!
My stuff as promised.
nice looking set of cues!
I can see that Ed had no interest in matching the rings. The Revo shaft, I have hit a few balls with.
I think they are really ugly.
I believe Busty just won master of the table at Derby City, playing with a regular old maple shaft with a standard ferrule.
I do want to disclose that I've been playing with a Tiger LD shaft which is 11.75 mm at the tip.
I hang that off my SW cue and I did get them to match the rings.
I can see that Ed had no interest in matching the rings. The Revo shaft, I have hit a few balls with.
I think they are really ugly.
I believe Busty just won master of the table at Derby City, playing with a regular old maple shaft with a standard ferrule.
I do want to disclose that I've been playing with a Tiger LD shaft which is 11.75 mm at the tip.
I hang that off my SW cue and I did get them to match the rings.
Ed had nothing to do with the Revo shaft. I bored, plugged, and retapped 3/8x10 myself.
And who cares what Busty won the Derby with....what does that have to do with a Revo shaft? He's been playing with traditional maple shafts his entire life.
I've said it a million times before and I'll say it again. Low deflection shafts are not necessarily better or worse than traditional shafts, however, I strongly believe that eliminating or reducing variables has a direct effect on the TIME it takes to improve.
It's just common sense folks.
Efren/Busty/<insert your favorite pro> have spent thousands of hours on the table getting to know their equipment and how much squirt and deflection are transferred at various speeds and stroke styles.
With newer technology, a player can improve quicker because there are fewer adjustments needed. Is a shaft going to turn you into a pro? of course not!
-P