I am very biased towards the BCAPL for a few simple reasons.
They are a class act run by professional people with the betterment of pool always up front.
My experience with the ACS (Our league is a dual sanction league, BCAPL and ACS) is exactly the opposite. Scott was right in one of his comments, the folks at the old BCA got their underwaer in a knot because the league was sold to Mark. They ranted for over a year after the sale how Mark Griffin was going to ruin the league, how it went from Non-profit to a for profit league, the BCA did this to us and they did that and on and on and on. Sounded like a bunch of children that got told to leave the sandbox. My view of non-profit orgs are; lots of people that want a title but don't do anything so in the long run they argue about everything and nothing meaningful gets accomplished
Here in Texas it's especially bad since the old BCA director is the ACS director. their state tourney was terrible. Poorly run, unorganized...basically bush league.
The National Tournament they have is about as big as our State BCAPL tourney and if you've ever been to the BCAPL Nationals you're in for a big surprise in June. The ACS is probably 10% the size...if that.
The ACS...hmmm? Trying to get Cue Sports included in the Olympics, who cares. At the National BCAPL tourney they have the pros right next door. The ACS tournament they have a Snooker Tournament and 3 cushion exhibition, once again who cares.
I truely wish the ACS would blow away and all those players still holding a grudge....come back to the BCAPL