Look, this approach is getting nowhere fast...
This thread was initiated asking about leagues, and the OP specifically excluded the APA league.
My initial response provided answers to the OP's questions regarding the USA Pool League and the BCA Pool League.
In response to my post, you demonstrated an APA twist on that matter...
I clarified that those were your twists, not mine, and then specifically addressed your questions.
By then, the OP, fully understood what I had stated and the answers too.
Yet, after answering all of your questions, you persist on this line.
So let's try something a little different. Since my answers to your questions doesn't put the matter to rest, let's try this. You answer your own questions (substituting in APA). So here you go.
Ultimately, since this whole line is off topic, if you want me to respond further feel free to start a separate thread, where it'd be more appropriate.
Oh, and I focused on National Tournament because that's where the official rules are defined... Trying to have this discussion based on league play could be even more convoluted because local bylaws can override some official rules. You'd be able to say whatever you want, and could be right. I'd be able to say whatever I wanted, and could be right. And we could both be saying the exact opposite things. Thus, it would bring forth no real conclusions, making this whole banter back and forth even more fruitless.
This thread was initiated asking about leagues, and the OP specifically excluded the APA league.
My initial response provided answers to the OP's questions regarding the USA Pool League and the BCA Pool League.
In response to my post, you demonstrated an APA twist on that matter...
I clarified that those were your twists, not mine, and then specifically addressed your questions.
By then, the OP, fully understood what I had stated and the answers too.
Yet, after answering all of your questions, you persist on this line.
So let's try something a little different. Since my answers to your questions doesn't put the matter to rest, let's try this. You answer your own questions (substituting in APA). So here you go.
In my edited reply I asked three questions.
1) Why does the APA have a (team) handicap limit?
2) Why penalize teams for exceeding that limit (usually preventing all 5 players from being able to play)?
3) If a team can endure an "excessive skill" penalty and still be competitive, what does that say about the APA team?
Ultimately, since this whole line is off topic, if you want me to respond further feel free to start a separate thread, where it'd be more appropriate.
Oh, and I focused on National Tournament because that's where the official rules are defined... Trying to have this discussion based on league play could be even more convoluted because local bylaws can override some official rules. You'd be able to say whatever you want, and could be right. I'd be able to say whatever I wanted, and could be right. And we could both be saying the exact opposite things. Thus, it would bring forth no real conclusions, making this whole banter back and forth even more fruitless.
Last edited: