ratcues said:I'm sorry, but that guy was wrong. Porper has parts, as do other manufacturers, made elsewhere, such as the Bison chuck (Poland), but the majority of the componants are made in California. I've been there, I've seen it, I'm friends with Joe, and I was helping in his booth at the SBE this year. I also filmed and new instructional DVD, for the machine, that is available, if you are interested in the Model B. Price of the DVD is reimbursed upon purchase of the machine.
There is no other machine on the market similar to Joe's. If you are worried about the cost of the machines involved in cuemaking, cuemaking probably isn't for you. If there is a better machine, with the same capabilities, of Joe's on the market, I'd love to see it.
JBCustomCues said:If it was'nt for the money issues everyone would have big metal lathes. Which in all reality you can get a good metal lathe for less than the porper model B. Its the tooling and some of the adaption for cue building that will reach in your pocket.
WildWestBilliar said:Is unique better than cuesmith
JBCustomCues said:And if this machine is so great why dont you see or hear of more people using it.
ratcues said:The Model be has two motors allowing the feedscrew to run without have the spindle run. Can't do that on any other machine that I know of.
The Model B can make a cue from square stock to finish turn by itself. There is also a pantograph attachment on its way to me in the next month or so. Keep an eye open for that. Joe had the prototype in Vegas at the trade show.
rhncue said:The one thing that you should inquire about is how easy it is to get support. That is what makes one machine superior to others.
Dick
WilleeCue said:One word of advice ... dont go into cue making on the cheap.
You will not like the results and you will end up selling it off and replacing it with something better.
ratcues said:It was brought to my attention this morning that I may be taking this thread a little too personally. I think I have and here's why. Joe is my friend and has been since I got into cuemaking. I have had a lot of imput on the machine over the past 18 months and improvements have been made. The Model B is an ever evovling machine and gets better as each year goes by, part of that stems from this forum. I guess I feel that since Joe is not on the forum, the Model B gets knocked in the dirt by people that have never used it.
That being said, starting a poll about which lathe a person uses serves no purpose. There are so many variables that there is no way it could be accurate. How long have you been making cues? What was your starting budget? Did you try any other machines?
It boils down to this; use that machine that you feel comfortable with. Do not go off of what everyone else thinks or says. Each of the "big three" perform as advertised. Visit some shops and talk to the representative for the machine. Find out what YOU want to do and find the machine that fits, not the other way around.
Fair enough?
bubsbug said:....I even have a 13x 40 metal lathe. ... For instance on some machine,s I can but on a thick pair of working gloves, spin the motor full throttle and actually grab the head chuck and stop it.
bubsbug said:For instance on some machine,s I can but on a thick pair of working gloves, spin the motor full throttle and actually grab the head chuck and stop it.
Kelly_Guy said:I don't care which machine it is, that seems very stupid and irresponsible to me as well.
Kelly
One famous cuemaker's assistance's hair got caught in the chuck.Kelly_Guy said:I don't care which machine it is, that seems very stupid and irresponsible to me as well.
Kelly
JoeyInCali said:One famous cuemaker's assistance's hair got caught in the chuck.
It wun't pretty as you can imagine.
Joey~Thinks 3/4 HP belt drive lathe is dangerous enough~