I know someone interested in buying a Mid-Size if the price is right!renegadej said:like to find someone whose willing to work a trade for deluxe cuesmith i have a almost new mid size cuesmith just wantind to start building a few cues
nympfisher said:i had thought of that,,changing headstock on my midsize.to the deluxe.
anybody done it ? cost ?
carl
qbilder said:It's expensive. I talked to Chris about just this & by the time you put everything on needed to create a near equivelant to the deluxe, it'll be costing a little over $2G. Might as well just buy the deluxe & keep your mid-size for other tasks. Trust me when I say money comes & money goes. Selling your midsize will get you a little cash, but not enough to buy the deluxe. And once you get going with cuemaking you'll wish you had kept that other lathe because it can do certain tasks while you are doing other tasks on another lathe. Having multiple machines set up for various tasks beats having one machine you have to constantly reconfigure to accomplish every task.
dave sutton said:Multiple lathes are a deff but it can be done for way less than 2000$. I have little to no use for the taper bars. I just offset my tailstock. Taper my pointed cues in two parts and my pj cues together. The new headstock upgrade is 500$.
Cutting my own shafts isn't really in my mind now. 4$ for the dowel 6 cuts over 6 months and then hope they're right. I'll just buy final tapered shafts for 20$ each
dave sutton said:Its a trick I learned from a cuemaker with almost 40 years experience. Points come out perfect the way I do it.
Also as a NEW maker there is not much value in cutting your own shafts. The process is long and hard. Maybe in a few years but right now. Learn to make a cue first then take steps to advance yourself.
As far as making the mid size competitive tyt prob the wrong word. It would he very very competitive with the larger headstock. I would love to hear why it wouldnt be
Tony Zinzola said:If you offset the tailstock to taper, I think it would be near impossible to get the same taper every time. You only have to be off by a couple of thousandths and your dimensions are different.
I had the same issues with cutting points by offsetting the tailstock. After I built my first cue I decided the setup time for the points was a major headache. I had no idea what I needed, but Chris suggested a milling machine. I couldn't imagine cutting points any other way. I have 0 setup time, unless I want to do 6 or 8 points and then my setup time is around 30 seconds.
Also, when you offset the tailstock, your piece isn't sitting perfectly in your center anymore.
dave sutton said:Well your right. I don't own both. However a very close friend does. The only true advantage is the bigger head and double chuck. Instead of talking shoe me some proof. How can you say one machine is so much more accurate then the other built by the same man. All I'm trying to do is save him money. I have yet to have a construction problem crooked pin Ajoint or insert using my method. Just bc I don't do my points one piece doesn't mean I can't or haven't. I like my results better this way.
Don't take anything I say wrong bc I have a great respect for you. Not everyone has the money to drop on a deluxe. As a matter of fact I think I can built an entire cue on the micro II. I know chris says its not for that but I think I can using my methods now
qbilder said:I'm not trying to argue, or negate your advice. I'm pointing out the major differences in the machines in question, and giving my opinion that if somebody wants to dive into cuemaking then they should begin with a capable lathe.
If you are doing things a certain way & it's working for you, then great for you. But it doesn't mean that it'll work the same way for anybody else. I admit I could build a functional cue on just about any lathe, but it's not going to be anything near the quality & accuracy I can get with a fully functional lathe set up for cue work. I'm not saying you are wrong for doing things the way you do. You do what you feel is right for you. But put things in perspective. You have only built a few cues & did it with equipment that forced you to improvise, instead of using equipment designed & equipped to do the tasks efficiently & accurately. Again, it might work for you. But what are your standards? What is your margin of accuracy? You say you can do this & do that & it works great for you, but what if your great is not good enough for somebody else? I'm not implying anything of your standards & do not expect you to answer these questions. I'm simply making the point that your idea of "just fine" may not be another's idea of "just fine".
By getting a capable lathe to begin with, there will be the opportunity of world class accuracy & true repeatability that is not a given with lesser machines. If one is going to learn cuemaking on a competent level, then a fully functional cuemaking machine is a must. If it's too expensive then maybe it's not the right hobby to learn, or the right time to learn it. Besides saving a few bucks, what advantage would one have by using lesser equipment & having to improvise techniques? There's lots of advantages to having the big lathe, even if it may cost a bit more. The accuracy alone is worth the difference in cost, not to mention all the other things that can be done more efficiently & effectively.
So back to square one, I feel it would be far smarter to spend the extra cash & get the right machine. And again, if it's not affordable then maybe it's not a smart move in the first place. Being an accomplished builder, I can look back at the time when I was at that early learning stage & see what decisions I made & evaluate the results. Beginning with a capable lathe was a good choice for me. The only advice I could offer with confidence to anybody beginning this skill is to get the right equipment first & don't quit when things get tough.
As far as ill feelings between you & me, not a chance. It's just a disagreement that makes for nice, informative conversation.