I am a feel player by nature, ghost ball being the only aiming system I have ever used, and that only sporadically. I do not use any sort of pivoting systems or anything like that, and my method of applying english is I think what people would classify as front-hand english. I had always used standard maple shafts, typically in the 12.5-13mm range, and I just received shipment of a predator cue with a 314-2 shaft after deciding to give LD a shot.
It will come as no surprise that I am having to adjust my aiming on cut shots with spin, but my question for those who have studied this technology is how much of what I'm adjusting for is reduced deflection and how much is simply due to increased spin. I am certainly getting more english (follow and draw as well as side spin) than I did with my previous cue, which may very well be a product of the LD technology, but it seems that much of what I am now compensating for is an increase in spin-induced throw rather than a reduction in deflection.
Here is a diagram of one particular shot that I studied intensely in my first practice session with the LD shaft:
The red dot cueball illustrates a shot with outside english and cueball A illustrates one with inside english. With my previous two playing cues (Judd with 13mm standard shaft & sniper tip, and scruggs with 12.5 mm shaft and moori medium tip), I was able to aim very close to the ghost ball (maybe within 1/4" variance) for both of these shots. It seems that my method of applying spin was producing a situation where the deflection and the spin-induced throw were, for the most part, canceling each other out on many shots.
With the 314-2 shaft, however, I have to aim a few inches to either side of the pocket (roughly at the 3 and 8 balls) depending on what spin I am using. The last time I had to make such an adjustment was when someone handed me a cue with a standard maple shaft in a small diameter (12mm or so) and a soft tip, and I just chalked that up to increased spin-induced throw. I am wondering if that is also the main reason for the adjustment I'm having to make with the predator on this shot, since the 12mm shaft I borrowed certainly would have been considered a high deflection shaft, but required the exact same adjustment as the 314-2 shaft.
Just so there's no confusion, I do know that I am experiencing less deflection with the predator shaft, because I have found other shots (especially low-speed extreme-spin shots) on which I used to compensate for deflection and now do not have to. It just seems that on the shot I diagrammed, hit at speed to go around the table, the major adjustment I am making is mostly for spin-induced throw. Does this explanation seem plausible to those of you have had to make the HD to LD adjustment?
Thanks,
Aaron
Edit: said CIT instead of spin-induced throw.
It will come as no surprise that I am having to adjust my aiming on cut shots with spin, but my question for those who have studied this technology is how much of what I'm adjusting for is reduced deflection and how much is simply due to increased spin. I am certainly getting more english (follow and draw as well as side spin) than I did with my previous cue, which may very well be a product of the LD technology, but it seems that much of what I am now compensating for is an increase in spin-induced throw rather than a reduction in deflection.
Here is a diagram of one particular shot that I studied intensely in my first practice session with the LD shaft:
The red dot cueball illustrates a shot with outside english and cueball A illustrates one with inside english. With my previous two playing cues (Judd with 13mm standard shaft & sniper tip, and scruggs with 12.5 mm shaft and moori medium tip), I was able to aim very close to the ghost ball (maybe within 1/4" variance) for both of these shots. It seems that my method of applying spin was producing a situation where the deflection and the spin-induced throw were, for the most part, canceling each other out on many shots.
With the 314-2 shaft, however, I have to aim a few inches to either side of the pocket (roughly at the 3 and 8 balls) depending on what spin I am using. The last time I had to make such an adjustment was when someone handed me a cue with a standard maple shaft in a small diameter (12mm or so) and a soft tip, and I just chalked that up to increased spin-induced throw. I am wondering if that is also the main reason for the adjustment I'm having to make with the predator on this shot, since the 12mm shaft I borrowed certainly would have been considered a high deflection shaft, but required the exact same adjustment as the 314-2 shaft.
Just so there's no confusion, I do know that I am experiencing less deflection with the predator shaft, because I have found other shots (especially low-speed extreme-spin shots) on which I used to compensate for deflection and now do not have to. It just seems that on the shot I diagrammed, hit at speed to go around the table, the major adjustment I am making is mostly for spin-induced throw. Does this explanation seem plausible to those of you have had to make the HD to LD adjustment?
Thanks,
Aaron
Edit: said CIT instead of spin-induced throw.
Last edited: