He is fun to watch, though, especially given the paucity of high-level American players.
he used to be quite a chore to watch when events didn't have shot clock.. he can be real slow.
He is fun to watch, though, especially given the paucity of high-level American players.
No, in his prime and even now, his break was, by a mile, the weakest part of his game. It was the reason that, despite elite tactical skills and solid pattern play, he could never win a major, and I do not recall him ever reaching the final of a major in either 9ball or 10ball.I didn’t see Bergman in his prime as sjm did, but I have watched almost every match he has played at the PLP and the St Louis events.
His tactics, strategy and safety play are very high level. He’s made some incredible shots, too. His only major shortcoming is with the short stick.
He just doesn't have enough experience on really tight equipment, and until he gets it, inconsistent pocketing is likely to remain the case. His pattern play, a strength in his prime, is still every bit world class.I am not sure if he’s struggled with tight pockets as much as sjm suggests. For long stretches he pockets balls with no problem. His cueball placement at times is unusually precise.
Yet Bergman has definitely been inconsistent. Out of the blue, he will miss some easily makeable shots. In many of those instances, though, the misses were bad enough that tight pockets weren’t the main issue in my view.
My suspicion is, the misses and lack of consistency stem mostly from not being a regular on tours that use tables with tighter pockets. You have to play on these tables a lot, under real world pressure, to truly become acclimated.
Can he get to that point? Oh, I think he can, but it won’t happen overnight. The best players on the tour have been playing under these conditions for years.
I didn't mention breaking as a weakness because Bergman actually broke pretty well at the PLP. He struggled a bit the first day to pocket the one, but seemed to get the hang of it the rest of the week.No, in his prime and even now, his break was, by a mile, the weakest part of his game. It was the reason that, despite elite tactical skills and solid pattern play, he could never win a major, and I do not recall him ever reaching the final of a major in either 9ball or 10ball.