Mahogany in cue construction

Catalin

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Hi all, I did a little search and it looks like mahogany is almost never used in cue construction. Is there a good reason for that? It seems to me that it would be at least as good as ebony.

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
 
Hi all, I did a little search and it looks like mahogany is almost never used in cue construction. Is there a good reason for that? It seems to me that it would be at least as good as ebony.

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk
You can use just about any wood you choose, if you learn about. If you core all of your woods, you have more choices.
Jmo
 
It seems to me that it would be at least as good as ebony.

Can you explain why you think so?

It used to be used in lower cost and bar cues.
Some true mahogany is fairly heavy/dense. Much more so than listed on the wood database.
Friend just had some from a project we were doing ID'd by NFPL it was so heavy/dense. It was true mahogany.
However, definitely not up there with typical cue butt woods which tend to have specific gravities past .90 & high janka numbers.
Most true mahogany is about the same density as black walnut (not very) and black walnut has 10% better Janka rating. You never see it in cues unless it is "claro" or burl, stabilized, and cored.

Bottom line, mahogany just is not very sexy in terms of rareness or cost, nor interesting looking in typical cue butt sizes, and it does not have the mechanical aspects to make it worth overlooking bland appearance.

As others noted, if you have a spectacular piece and stabilize (densify) and core it, you can use almost anything.

smt
 
Most black walnut is bland....BUT burl or claro, as stated above is used. This is my black walnut burl cue and extension. It is cored.
20220305_211931.jpg
20220306_000145.jpg
 
Can you explain why you think so?

It used to be used in lower cost and bar cues.
Some true mahogany is fairly heavy/dense. Much more so than listed on the wood database.
Friend just had some from a project we were doing ID'd by NFPL it was so heavy/dense. It was true mahogany.
However, definitely not up there with typical cue butt woods which tend to have specific gravities past .90 & high janka numbers.
Most true mahogany is about the same density as black walnut (not very) and black walnut has 10% better Janka rating. You never see it in cues unless it is "claro" or burl, stabilized, and cored.

Bottom line, mahogany just is not very sexy in terms of rareness or cost, nor interesting looking in typical cue butt sizes, and it does not have the mechanical aspects to make it worth overlooking bland appearance.

As others noted, if you have a spectacular piece and stabilize (densify) and core it, you can use almost anything.

smt
I do have some highly figured mahogany, so more interesting pieces do exist, but it's pretty light, so it will definently have to be cored.
 
I know Viking used mahogany back in the late 80-early 90s in some cues. Had to repair some after the forearms snapped just under the joint collars. I replaced the forearms with cored mahogany and they looked original afterwards.
 
Back
Top