The Machine
Registered
I have been passionate about pool for 17 years. In that time I have resided in 7-8 fairly large centres, and have always played in tournaments and supported the game. I have played in over 350 tourneys, won masses of small ones, and have one $1000 win, as well as 2 $500 wins.
Today I read much of the postings regarding how to get the masses to follow pool, and to garner a TV audience.
I believe the answer to be simple. Create avid fans and players out of the MASSES that present themselves to the game. It is called networking.
I have seen literally thousands of results from tourneys. PAY MORE PLAYERS. More happy, bragging, proud players create goodwill, advertising, and new players, not to mention keeping those players themselves in the game.
Here is what I mean. Take your smallest "pub" tourney. 16 players...$10 each. This gives a prize fund of $160. Almost invariably, the payouts are $90, $50 and $20. So now you have 3 "happy and proud" players, and 13 losers. Many times the first 3 are always the same, which is why so many pub tourneys have gone by the wayside, cos Jo Blo never has a chance.
I see the same in major events. I just saw one yesterday where 1st place got over $1000, while 5th place got $75.(and was Earl Strickland). This is ridiculous.
If this tourney offered $250, $175, $100, $75, $50(2), $40(2), $30(4), $20(4), 16 players would be paid, excited, promoting, and KEEP COMING TO TOURNEYS. (and you add it up, is less than first place in the actual event)
Same with the pub tourney. By paying $40, $30, $20, $15, $10(2), $5(2), 8 of the 16 would be promoting and happy.
And, amazingly enough, the top guys would not be there nearly as often, for the potential prize is not enough. This is great! Now you have OTHER players getting a taste, promoting, being excited, bringing their friends, etc.
The same holds true back to the bigger events. You offer $1000 for first, I will drive a few hours, pay for a hotel and compete. As will other players. So now me, and the 4-5 other travelers, will take the money and leave all the locals not wanting to enter the next one, cos they have no chance at the money. And 2-3 of us "travelers" will still lose money on the venture.
But at $250 for first, I won't, and neither will a lot of "top" regional guys. This opens the door for NEW "champions", NEW "ambassadors". And these guys will be more local, guaranteed.
To make a long story short, in the basic and intermediate levels, the tourneys are geared to pay out big first place money. This cripples the game. Who cares if a marquee player comes? How about allowing all the bread and potatoes guys from the area to experience the thrill of winning.
We, as a sport, have the players...in droves. What we are not doing is cultivating those players and allowing them to blossom into "players"
Final note. I live in a city of 100,000 people. It has one pool room, and one tourney a week. It is $20 to enter, and 4-6 people get paid. There is not one bar or pub tourney and hasn't been for a few years.
Today I read much of the postings regarding how to get the masses to follow pool, and to garner a TV audience.
I believe the answer to be simple. Create avid fans and players out of the MASSES that present themselves to the game. It is called networking.
I have seen literally thousands of results from tourneys. PAY MORE PLAYERS. More happy, bragging, proud players create goodwill, advertising, and new players, not to mention keeping those players themselves in the game.
Here is what I mean. Take your smallest "pub" tourney. 16 players...$10 each. This gives a prize fund of $160. Almost invariably, the payouts are $90, $50 and $20. So now you have 3 "happy and proud" players, and 13 losers. Many times the first 3 are always the same, which is why so many pub tourneys have gone by the wayside, cos Jo Blo never has a chance.
I see the same in major events. I just saw one yesterday where 1st place got over $1000, while 5th place got $75.(and was Earl Strickland). This is ridiculous.
If this tourney offered $250, $175, $100, $75, $50(2), $40(2), $30(4), $20(4), 16 players would be paid, excited, promoting, and KEEP COMING TO TOURNEYS. (and you add it up, is less than first place in the actual event)
Same with the pub tourney. By paying $40, $30, $20, $15, $10(2), $5(2), 8 of the 16 would be promoting and happy.
And, amazingly enough, the top guys would not be there nearly as often, for the potential prize is not enough. This is great! Now you have OTHER players getting a taste, promoting, being excited, bringing their friends, etc.
The same holds true back to the bigger events. You offer $1000 for first, I will drive a few hours, pay for a hotel and compete. As will other players. So now me, and the 4-5 other travelers, will take the money and leave all the locals not wanting to enter the next one, cos they have no chance at the money. And 2-3 of us "travelers" will still lose money on the venture.
But at $250 for first, I won't, and neither will a lot of "top" regional guys. This opens the door for NEW "champions", NEW "ambassadors". And these guys will be more local, guaranteed.
To make a long story short, in the basic and intermediate levels, the tourneys are geared to pay out big first place money. This cripples the game. Who cares if a marquee player comes? How about allowing all the bread and potatoes guys from the area to experience the thrill of winning.
We, as a sport, have the players...in droves. What we are not doing is cultivating those players and allowing them to blossom into "players"
Final note. I live in a city of 100,000 people. It has one pool room, and one tourney a week. It is $20 to enter, and 4-6 people get paid. There is not one bar or pub tourney and hasn't been for a few years.