Missed calling "you're on 2", but did call "on 2" after 3rd foul. Is he on 2 now?

[Tennesseejoe]

Knife-man,
Actually, each of Buddy's 4 attempts was quite similar; but George kept putting him in a situation where the kick (3 rails) - was just a bit more difficult each time; and Buddy didn't disturb the balls much each time. The last kick was by far the most difficult (the reason Efren couldn't wait to try it - it looked impossible, only a billiards expert would tackle it).

Could you set this up on the WEI table? Many thanks.

 

[Williebetmore]

Could you set this up on the WEI table? Many thanks.

TJ,
I could give you an approximation; but neither my work or home computer tolerates the WEI anymore.

Basically, it involved a 3-rail kick, through traffic, using heavy reverse (not running) English, to a very small target. Come to DCC in January and I'll set it up for you in the AZB room.

 

[brandoncook26]

While I agree that letting them know they are on 2 is the non-fouling players responsibility, and that they should get acknowledgment, I have never agreed that he should have to remember to tell them as the other player is coming to the table.

Once that fouling player has agreed that he is on two, it should be HIS responsibility to remember. Shouldnt a player be responsible for his own game?

I know some rules are being written so that you have to tell them as they are coming to the table, I just dont agree. You should have to get the player on two to acknowledge, and then it should be on him. But it shouldnt be your job to remind him of where he is in the game.


Just my opinion, and I know others may not feel the same

Well said. This was more or less the idea I was conveying earlier. I guess I should learn to be more direct.