I own 2 original Balabushka's and have hit with several others. The ones I've played with have all played good to great. Then I think about the fact they are 40 years old and I am blown away with how good they are. If a 40+ year old cue is as good as todays standards it must have been something truly remarkable back then. Hit is subjective but the Balabushka's I own are both still dead straight, what does that say about his work....
I think Balabushka's contribution to the history of cues and cue making was huge and helped paved the way for todays work.
Today there are hundreds of cue makers that can make you a fantastic cue. 40 - 50 years ago there were only a handful and George was one of them.
Balabushka's play great. True these older cues tend to have more weight rearward, but that's why they feel lighter than they really are. They were heavier because the balls were dead and the cloth was thick.
The guy that said that Balabushka's hit hard as a rock just needed to have the cue re-tipped. Old cues have dried out well petrified tips that are as hard as a rock.
Maybe not everyone has had a chance to play with a Balabushka. I've hit balls with a few. The closest thing I can compare a Balabushka to is a 1960's Ginacue. If someone has played with a Gina Titlist conversion from the 1960's, they are one heck of a great playing cue and are very similar in many ways to a Balabushka.
Asking who is today's Balabushka is like asking what is today's equivalent of a 57 Chevy. Answer: nothing.
Last edited: