Mosconi Cup Selections..

By this logic Stephen Hendry's seven world titles "don't mean much" as it's a seeded event.

If you lose seeding then you potentially make it even more unfair, and end up with situations where one side of the draw is stacked with the best players while the other side contains only a couple of good players and a bunch of also rans. Then you end up with a situation where your champion beat only one or two top players to win the title.

I am fine with putting folks in different brackets...ie NCAA tournament style where the top seeds are put in regions. But for having them only win a match or two to get the finals...come on now you know better than that.

Ken
 
Their selection process has actually been transparent from the start, there was never any shady
stuff like 'they claim it's this but really it's that'...

I admit, I didn't actually know that. Guess I just make the incorrect assumption that all the "thread turmoil" actually has a basis in reality. :rolleyes:

Believe me, if it was "whoever they want" in the past, you won't see non-telegenic dudes like Shawn Putnam.

"telegenic"... cool word! I wanted to think that you made that up. But it's in the dictionary.

I like Putnam, I actually met him once, great guy. But yes, you are right, he may not be the most telegenic guy out there.

Fatz
 
I am fine with putting folks in different brackets...ie NCAA tournament style where the top seeds are put in regions. But for having them only win a match or two to get the finals...come on now you know better than that.

Ken

Seedings are one thing, byes are another. I can see the point of qualifiers for professional events - e.g. the top 16 seeds are entered automatically, and a qualifying event decides the other 16 entrants. If it's a match or two to get to the finals then I can see your point, though.
 
I guess I should not state that with 100 percent assuredness. Let's just say that I heard he was in, but, of course, things can change, so who knows? I'm sure we will all be finding out soon. :smile:

I'll bet they had a long talk with him first.
 
They may have had a talk but it won't matter. When thinking of Earl and the Cup, I'm reminded of A Few Good Men.... I can see everyone sitting around discussing this with Earl and he jumps up like Col. Jessup and screams "Deep down inside you want me on that wall.. You need me on that wall."

Also, I'm coming back to the game after a 10 year layoff and I've watched a lot of streaming in the past few months. There has been a lot of good pool played but if the chips were on the line and we needed someone to step up and stab somebody... You'd look to Earl. Don't know how you wouldn't have him on the team. Personally, if he is not on there, I won't be watching.
 
They may have had a talk but it won't matter. When thinking of Earl and the Cup, I'm reminded of A Few Good Men.... I can see everyone sitting around discussing this with Earl and he jumps up like Col. Jessup and screams "Deep down inside you want me on that wall.. You need me on that wall."

Also, I'm coming back to the game after a 10 year layoff and I've watched a lot of streaming in the past few months. There has been a lot of good pool played but if the chips were on the line and we needed someone to step up and stab somebody... You'd look to Earl. Don't know how you wouldn't have him on the team. Personally, if he is not on there, I won't be watching.

a week ago I decided exactly that. not that it will make any difference that I won't watch........but, I mean really.....if it is not earl I believe that it would be based on personality conflicts only and that is not a good enough reason when WE NEED THE WIN! :thumbup:
 
All products need a selling point. Matchroom just announced theirs in EARL :thumbup:

On another note
Euro Selection. Makes a mock of being current 9 Ball WC. All that training, preparation, practice and sweat for what...

That's pool folks :thumbup:
 
Seedings are one thing, byes are another. I can see the point of qualifiers for professional events - e.g. the top 16 seeds are entered automatically, and a qualifying event decides the other 16 entrants. If it's a match or two to get to the finals then I can see your point, though.

Thats what seeding is, basically giving them "byes" pass the early rounds. :rolleyes:

What do you think seeding is? :eek:
Ken
 
Back
Top