I've been working on CTE/Pro One for a couple of months now. The initial month, I was putting 3 to 4 hours each and every day into it. I wasn't seeing the kind of progress that I was expecting and have backed off it a fair amount since then. I actually spent a few weeks experimenting with SEE as I had, at one point, purchased training materials for that system.
I have a lesson scheduled with Stan the third week of March. I'd like to put in some more time with the system prior to that lesson.
Perhaps I'm mistaken, as it is perception, but I don't feel like I have much difficulty finding the correct visuals. If I'm seeing it correctly, there are only two visuals you can see on most shots those being either CTE/ET(AorC depending upon which way the cut goes) or CTE, ETB. If I align my dominant eye from CCB to COB, and move my head right or left, the first time I see CTE is when A or C is the other visual. If I keep moving my head, the next time I get a visual of CTE is when you have ETB. I say this but perhaps somehow I am mistaken. Please clarify.
Assuming I am getting the correct visuals, obviously, I'm missing the pocket due to what is happening from there. That leaves two potential culprits, either my move into CCB or my stroke. When I'm practicing CTE/Pro One, I do several things to take the "bad stroke" element out of the equation. One is stay strictly on CCB and to stay as close to the center vertical axis as possible. Another is to take a shorter back stroke to make sure a long backstroke isn't putting some "crook" into my delivery. I also try to maintain a 4 speed (20 diamonds travel up and back) to make sure I don't stress my stroke in any manner. In other words, I have no concern about working on CB position, I am simply trying to learn and prove out the aiming process.
I have watched the DVD totally through 5 to 10 times. I have watched the Pro One sections 12 to 20 times, some more than others. I have tried what appeared to be the way Stan moved into CCB primarily. I've found this will work on the thicker cuts fairly well even though it often leaves me feeling all corkscrewed up with my body/stance alignment. Thinner cuts with a right sweep are near impossible using what I perceived. To clarify here, there is nothing on the DVD relating to footwork or realignment. It always appeared to me with Stan that his legs stayed relatively still. Somewhere in the DVD, he even mentioned bending over slightly to get your visuals when right sweeps are involved. I took this as a solution to being "jammed up".
I will practice on the kind of "proposition" shots Stan has set up on the sheets he sends. I can do those quite well, the misses that do occur are very close. I can accept that on a 9' Diamond for now. However, when I "so to speak" take it to the table" and actually play with it, that falls apart. Most misses still reasonably close but way too many misses to even consider this for playing competitively. I would add, taking it to the table in this case means playing the ghost. I still use the same approach in not being concerned about CB position but simply wanting to see a variety of shots to attempt. Those practice proposition shots are all fine and dandy but at some point, who is to say that I'm making them with Pro One or just from memory.
I think I get it, i.e., once I get the visuals, I'm simply trying to figure out how to move into CCB with a half pivot. I would guess most people find it easier to use a left pivot. Whenever the sweep is smaller (most thick cuts), I actually find it more effective and comfortable using the opposite visuals and right sweep.
I tried the step in approach after watching the video BobN posted. This seemed to help but also didn't seem to be completely consistent when the distance between CB and OB started to vary much. After reading Stan's post where he "discounted" this approach as not being a viable solution, but did comment that footwork was necessary, I'm even more frustrated.
I read more and more comments about the visual sweeps. Okay, I must be missing it. I apparently am not sweeping correctly, it is eluding me. And all that's nice but regardless of the visual sweeps, there are still physical movements involved. There are so many different things said to. Step in right, step in left. Sweep in with the CTE visual in mind. Move in directly to CCB. Perhaps all of these can be made to work. Apparently they are as people who are claiming success and posting nice videos are describing these somewhat conflicting processes.
I'm really encouraged by all the success stories and videos being posted. Conceptually, I like the idea of the Pro One approach. I'm simply beginning to wonder if I'm going to be able to make it work for me. To make it perfectly clear, I'm not being critical of the system, I'm acknowledging my own shortcomings and seeking help to try and overcome them.
I have a lesson scheduled with Stan the third week of March. I'd like to put in some more time with the system prior to that lesson.
Perhaps I'm mistaken, as it is perception, but I don't feel like I have much difficulty finding the correct visuals. If I'm seeing it correctly, there are only two visuals you can see on most shots those being either CTE/ET(AorC depending upon which way the cut goes) or CTE, ETB. If I align my dominant eye from CCB to COB, and move my head right or left, the first time I see CTE is when A or C is the other visual. If I keep moving my head, the next time I get a visual of CTE is when you have ETB. I say this but perhaps somehow I am mistaken. Please clarify.
Assuming I am getting the correct visuals, obviously, I'm missing the pocket due to what is happening from there. That leaves two potential culprits, either my move into CCB or my stroke. When I'm practicing CTE/Pro One, I do several things to take the "bad stroke" element out of the equation. One is stay strictly on CCB and to stay as close to the center vertical axis as possible. Another is to take a shorter back stroke to make sure a long backstroke isn't putting some "crook" into my delivery. I also try to maintain a 4 speed (20 diamonds travel up and back) to make sure I don't stress my stroke in any manner. In other words, I have no concern about working on CB position, I am simply trying to learn and prove out the aiming process.
I have watched the DVD totally through 5 to 10 times. I have watched the Pro One sections 12 to 20 times, some more than others. I have tried what appeared to be the way Stan moved into CCB primarily. I've found this will work on the thicker cuts fairly well even though it often leaves me feeling all corkscrewed up with my body/stance alignment. Thinner cuts with a right sweep are near impossible using what I perceived. To clarify here, there is nothing on the DVD relating to footwork or realignment. It always appeared to me with Stan that his legs stayed relatively still. Somewhere in the DVD, he even mentioned bending over slightly to get your visuals when right sweeps are involved. I took this as a solution to being "jammed up".
I will practice on the kind of "proposition" shots Stan has set up on the sheets he sends. I can do those quite well, the misses that do occur are very close. I can accept that on a 9' Diamond for now. However, when I "so to speak" take it to the table" and actually play with it, that falls apart. Most misses still reasonably close but way too many misses to even consider this for playing competitively. I would add, taking it to the table in this case means playing the ghost. I still use the same approach in not being concerned about CB position but simply wanting to see a variety of shots to attempt. Those practice proposition shots are all fine and dandy but at some point, who is to say that I'm making them with Pro One or just from memory.
I think I get it, i.e., once I get the visuals, I'm simply trying to figure out how to move into CCB with a half pivot. I would guess most people find it easier to use a left pivot. Whenever the sweep is smaller (most thick cuts), I actually find it more effective and comfortable using the opposite visuals and right sweep.
I tried the step in approach after watching the video BobN posted. This seemed to help but also didn't seem to be completely consistent when the distance between CB and OB started to vary much. After reading Stan's post where he "discounted" this approach as not being a viable solution, but did comment that footwork was necessary, I'm even more frustrated.
I read more and more comments about the visual sweeps. Okay, I must be missing it. I apparently am not sweeping correctly, it is eluding me. And all that's nice but regardless of the visual sweeps, there are still physical movements involved. There are so many different things said to. Step in right, step in left. Sweep in with the CTE visual in mind. Move in directly to CCB. Perhaps all of these can be made to work. Apparently they are as people who are claiming success and posting nice videos are describing these somewhat conflicting processes.
I'm really encouraged by all the success stories and videos being posted. Conceptually, I like the idea of the Pro One approach. I'm simply beginning to wonder if I'm going to be able to make it work for me. To make it perfectly clear, I'm not being critical of the system, I'm acknowledging my own shortcomings and seeking help to try and overcome them.