Shane is the best at manipulating the rack in a rack-your-own format.
Take that away and you can see why he falls short in international events.
And we all know for 80 percent of players that is not the case. Particularly players who rarely play on 9 footers.I'm pretty sure Mike Page has provided info in the past to show that someone's Fargo Rating applies equally as good on a 7-foot table as it does on a 9-foot table.
_______
Ummm, the question was more getting at the pros who normally play on 9-footers and then decide to play on a 7-footer. I would say for pros, the ratings will be very close. Mike Page can maybe answer your point, for a casual league player than only plays on 7-foot tables, will their ratings drop on a 9-foot table. You could be right, but we were discussing pros in this case and I recall Mike Page's info that he provided being for a pro (might have even been for Skylar).And we all know for 80 percent of players that is not the case. Particularly players who rarely play on 9 footers.
I'm pretty sure Mike Page has provided info in the past to show that someone's Fargo Rating applies equally as good on a 7-foot table as it does on a 9-foot table.
_______
I havent had a chance to watch the link, but with the technology today, I would like to see a breakdown of relevant stats for so called "kiddie" tables vs. 9ft tables. One would think there would be a drastic and obvious difference in BnR's, packages, accuracy etc.
As a league player that played half of each session on 7 ft. Diamonds and the other on 9 ft. Brunswick, I had more "rackless" , "break and runs", and "8 on the break " on the 9 footers than the diamonds. Maybe I am an anomaly?
I thoroughly enjoyed the sky vs. Shane match (minus the announcers). For those that won't watch world class pool on 7ft. tables , I would encourage you to give it another shot.
The same things that are paramount on any big table tourney are the same. Break well, choose the correct pattern, control the cueball...heck it might not be long until there are more world class tourneys on small tables...
Bar Box was invented to sell Beer. Not for the betterment of the game etc. Brunswick made the 9Footer "The Standard" so they could fit more tables in their Factory Designed Billiard rooms (used to be 10' was the norm).
world class tourneys on small tables...now there are 6 words that should never be mentioned in that order.
At the DCC what does everyone flock to (other than the late rounds of the One Pocket)? Answer: The Big Foot event. Notice how the straightest shooters in the World don't grow up or even compete on BB unless in the US. Off the top of your head. Who are the straightest shooters? The Euros are practicing 14.1. Fador has a 10Foot Diamond in his homeroom. The USA is doomed at Mosconi unless they put down the Crack Pipe (BB) and develop some Juniors who can't spell barbox.
Before you start...what about the congestion? BB is just as tough. Yeah sure. 14.1 & One Hole are played with a full rack and most if not all the balls are down in the bottom half.
I agree with a lot of what you are saying here. However, I think we can both agree that for now, the heyday of pool halls is gone...the days when every town had a pool hall, and heck, most larger hotels had a billiards room...
I don't know the answer to this, but how many pool halls do you find in Europe? Not the private clubs, but pool halls where everyday folks walk in and shoot pool?
I have been in a total of 2 English pubs. Both had valley clones in them. Not English 8 ball, not snooker, and not 9 footers. Regular old run of the mill valley bar boxes. Again, my experience with European pool is a single two week trip, but I imagine the economics there are similar. A choice between a single 9 footer, or a 7 footer and 2 dart boards...not really a choice at all.
Point is most casual and/or amateur players, the ones the industry needs to continue buying cues, cases, hustler t shirts, etc...they don't care what size table it is played on...just like most casual golf fans don't care if a course plays 5600 feet or 5000 feet.
A 7-pack was high for both players.... In this match there was an 8-pack (SVB) and a 7-pack (Sky). ...
Well as good as some pros are on barboxes....they too are overrated on nine foot tables. There's many pros who clearly show this as well.Ummm, the question was more getting at the pros who normally play on 9-footers and then decide to play on a 7-footer. I would say for pros, the ratings will be very close. Mike Page can maybe answer your point, for a casual league player than only plays on 7-foot tables, will their ratings drop on a 9-foot table. You could be right, but we were discussing pros in this case and I recall Mike Page's info that he provided being for a pro (might have even been for Skylar).
EDIT: Thinking about the casual league players a little more. I think if 2 players only play on 7-foot tables then decide to play on a 9-foot table, both players will likely equally struggle more on the 9-footer. But guess what? As far as the ratings go, if they both struggle, the games won will probably end-up being the SAME as on the 7-footer. Thus, no change in ratings.