I will most certainly qualify what I had said.
Most of what erik said was true, execpt for a few minor details, that are important. When I tried the cue, I did not try the wobbled shaft. Second, As most of us know, that a slight wobble is fine in a cue. However, it was not a wobble from a traditional slight warp, but a major defect in the construction of the shaft. Even though the wobble was slight it was still a very critical defect. How do I know this.
I Showed the cue to a very well known chicago cue maker that hangs out at chris' billiards. I don't think I need to mention his name, but Erik does know of him. This cue maker pointed out the problem and said it was a defect. I then called COker himself. I told me that the defect was possible but the only person who bought the cue from him could return it. I then contacted erik.
WE AGREED on a settlement price for him to take the cue back. We tried to arrange a time for me to drive back to his house to make a switch. He kept putting it off. Then for three weeks straight he would not return my calls or emails what so ever.
How I got stiffed. Well, I guess I got stiffed in either of a couple of ways. One, I was sold a defective cue (not with just a slight wobble) and he did not stand behind is merchandise. Or two, he did not keep his end of the deal after we agreed to on me taking a loss on the cue. I had to end up selling it with one shaft and sold it for 400.00 bucks, since he ignored by calls or emails.
I was civil and congenial (sp?) the entire time. I did not want to start a whole big fiasco with this but I do feel I was wronged.
I am sure many of you have had fine dealing with erik, that is why I prefaced what I said before, with , " he seemed like a nice guy, and that it was a shame". You can make up your own mind on the situation.
Jordan