Not to start a war here, and I have already given my opinion to Tom, but I think there are far too many players in the Hall. Some of the people being inducted are "pool players". They played pool for a number of years "pretty good". So that gets you in the hall because you played pool for 15 years? There are a few that never won a tournament of any consequence. So, I suggest a criteria like baseballs hall.
You have to be out of the game for 5 years. Now since pool players can play into their 70's and 80's, I suggest an additional way to get in. If you are still active and the number of years you have been playing and your age total 70. So if a guy is 45 years old and has been playing tournaments since he was 20 (25 years playing + 45 years old= 70) he would be eligible.
So, how are we going to prove that a guy started playing at 20 and not 24? Well, you are not. That is what the election committee would be for. Pool is a very, very niche sport. Everyone knows everyone else. Hell, I know of guys that play high in Oklahoma and I have never stepped foot in the state. It would be up to the committee to satisfy themselves that a player has been playing for a period of time. Do a little investigation as it were.
I am very much appreciative of the work the Tom and Ray (RIP) have done to resurrect the Hall and make it active again. I would like it to stay a Hall of Fame and not be a Hall of Pretty Good.
Bob