New member: Any Thoughts on McDermott COTY?

Seiji Lépine

Seiji Lépine

Active member
Hello,

For a moment of madness, I've put an order in for a 2022 McDermott Cue of The Year Enhanced.
I would say I am a very mediocre player; however, I do enjoy the game and have bought a few
nice cues along the way. My cue won't be completed for a couple of months, but I thought before
it's too late, it would be nice to know other persons experience with the variable weight system
and how these Cue of The Year hit. I've not elected the iPro shaft, that's just too thin for my taste
and so I've elected to swap it out for the I2 shafts at 13mm. I've always played with 13mm and I doubt
I can change over to anything thinner.

It will look like this one for the most part with two I2 shafts modified with matching rings of the H4451.
Dave at McDermott is a great person and has been allowing me to personalize slightly the H4451.
It certainly looks quite different from my older cues.

s-l1600.jpg


Regards

S...

Some of the other cues I own and enjoy playing with are TAD and Bill McDaniel. I tend to prefer
hard hitting cues with a lot of feedback with very stiff shafts.
My other cues, not as nice looking and from decades ago. The pointed TAD is from 1960s. The McDaniel has ivory inlays.
ucDvkpz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice cue. Get yourself a can of car wax and wax it every time you take it out of the house to go play pool. Have yourself a good cue holder for whenever you are racking or breaking.
 
Definitely too much going on for my liking. I prefer a much simpler look on my cues.

That said, it is some fantastic work.
 
Seiji said:
Hello,

For a moment of madness, I've put an order in for a 2022 McDermott Cue of The Year Enhanced.
I would say I am a very mediocre player; however, I do enjoy the game and have bought a few
nice cues along the way. My cue won't be completed for a couple of months, but I thought before
it's too late, it would be nice to know other persons experience with the variable weight system
and how these Cue of The Year hit. I've not elected the iPro shaft, that's just too thin for my taste
and so I've elected to swap it out for the I2 shafts at 13mm. I've always played with 13mm and I doubt
I can change over to anything thinner.

It will look like this one for the most part with two I2 shafts modified with matching rings of the H4451.
Dave at McDermott is a great person and has been allowing me to personalize slightly the H4451.
It certainly looks quite different from my older cues.

View attachment 728779

Regards

S...

Some of the other cues I own and enjoy playing with are TAD and Bill McDaniel. I tend to prefer
hard hitting cues with a lot of feedback with very stiff shafts.
My other cues, not as nice looking and from decades ago. The pointed TAD is from 1960s. The McDaniel has ivory inlays.
View attachment 728697
Click to expand...

Hi Seiji,

I can share some information with you because I play with the VBP too.

The VBP gives a lot more adjustability in the cue butt compared to other cue manufacturers.
The VBP cue butt is on the stiffer side.
The finish on the H series is smooth and glossy. I have not tried the other series but I guess it will be the same smoothness and gloss.
 
you mentioned cue 4 (from the left is a tad)
is the first cue from the left also tad?
 
Seiji said:
It is a TAD with logo on the butt cap. Tad was still very much up and walking about when I got that cue. It's in played condition with signs of many games on it. It is the best playing cue of the lot. Many have tried to get it from me but it's not worth much to sell it. I've been told it's uncommon to see the bottom made from a different wood. I think it would have looked better as all birdseye.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the reply
I have owned several tad’s of different models and they all played great
 
is the first cue from the left also tad?
Click to expand...

whoever made it, that has been my favorite cue to look at since you opened your toy box!
Second, the box cue.
Which is sort of odd, me being all about full splice sneakies.....:)
But there is just something classy about those 2.

smt
 
Seiji said:
it would be nice to know other persons experience with the variable weight system
Click to expand...
Much older posts mentioned that replacement weights for the variable weight system were expensive. The prices now seem reasonable at an Ebay site that sells weights, stabilizer parts, and bumpers. See https://www.ebay.com/itm/2831218731...d=link&campid=5335988529&toolid=20001&mkevt=1

Someday, I would like to buy a used, cheap H-series and I wonder does it matter what weight it is? If one buys a too-heavy 21-ounce H-series cue, is it easy to turn it into an 18-ounce cue? Is it a simple manner of buying the right weights?

I was curious, too, of how the weights are selected to get the total weight? If one bought a three-ounce weight, it would seem to defeat the system's purpose instead of placing three one-ounce weights spread out along the inner shaft. The Ebay site has 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 oz. weights.

I am impressed at the variety of wood, pearls, varnishes, and what-the-hell-else McDermott can provide for a cue.

I read a champion pool player's book where he wrote that its not good to always be buying cues. I wonder. Is that poor advice?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top