If i have a tiny ding in my shaft from a night of league play or a simple bump into a chair or table etc..It drives me nuts until i fix it.
I can make it perfectly slick and smooth again so fast,easy and cheap That the idea of $hipping it out with in$urance and waiting to see if it gets lost or damaged in transit, Then $pending $40.00 $$ to have it Extra slick until the next minor incident comes along seems absurd at best.
That being said,It may be perfect for preserving a cue that is no longer used, for generations to come (if it actually holds true over the test of time?) this would be a very good investment.
but for the most part my 30-40 year old cues are plenty straight don't need a lot of extra help to $tay that way. and "very slick" is plenty slick for me.
If it was something i could do as often as i wanted to at my own convenience even at some added cost, i would say AWESOME!
I just cant see it for a shooter cue.
But it sounds like an excellent preservation method for a cue that gets very little or no play.
I'm Jayman, and I approved this analysis.
I can make it perfectly slick and smooth again so fast,easy and cheap That the idea of $hipping it out with in$urance and waiting to see if it gets lost or damaged in transit, Then $pending $40.00 $$ to have it Extra slick until the next minor incident comes along seems absurd at best.
That being said,It may be perfect for preserving a cue that is no longer used, for generations to come (if it actually holds true over the test of time?) this would be a very good investment.
but for the most part my 30-40 year old cues are plenty straight don't need a lot of extra help to $tay that way. and "very slick" is plenty slick for me.
If it was something i could do as often as i wanted to at my own convenience even at some added cost, i would say AWESOME!
I just cant see it for a shooter cue.
But it sounds like an excellent preservation method for a cue that gets very little or no play.
I'm Jayman, and I approved this analysis.
Last edited: