Thecoats said:
If you are paid to express your opinion in a public forum you should take it upon yourself to be aware of societal expressions that are no longer acceptable. I am not killing Jay as he is an awesome commentator and a great guy but I do not think he gets a full pass just because you feel he may have been ignorant about using the term "deaf-mute".
-don
First, whether someone is being paid to make public statements is irrelevent.
Second, as I pointed out, Jay's comment was correct as stated and Shane's serious physiological challenge to speech was offset largely due to his mother's early recognition and persistent intervention.
IMHO, you are being excessivley sensitive to his use of that phrase. It has to be taken in context which was absolutely not intended to ridicule but rather to compliment Shane.
IMHO, the comment, in its context, would not be viewed as "offensive"...certainly not by the general public who heard the comment in its obviously favorable context.
IHMO, given the context, the hearing impaired community would not be "offended" either.
Shane's mom may disagree with the above, but I would be surprised if she does. My GUESS is that such a comment, presented in its proper context would have been largely ignored and if not, it would not have incited any significant negative emotion.
Frankly, the evolution in pop culture expressions that change so often are a little silly...especially since, as noted in my other post, the groups intended to be identified by such terms....Black vs. African American, for example, are THEMSELVES not in full agreement on how to refer to themselves!
The overriding issue is the CONTEXT in which such references are presented.
It is silly because the phrases conjur the EXACT SAME mental image. Say "pooh pooh' or the "S" word or "sexual intercourse" instead of the "f" word and you think of exactly the same things...so what difference does it make???????????
Regards,
Jim