spin
I compared my OB 1 shaft to another cue which had a larger tip diameter and a different taper and of course a different tip and discovered that while shooting the same shot over and over with the same amount of side English that the cue ball traveled to a similar location with both shafts. The OB1 however deflected the cue ball only about 1/4" versus the flat laminated shaft/cue deflected the cue ball about 2".
I don't know what to make of this and paid close attention to aiming at the same exact spot, applying the same amount of side spin. After thinking about it, the flat laminated, slightly larger diameter shaft may have given more spin to the cue ball than the OB 1. I find that hard to believe but will experiment further.
Any other re-thoughts about the OB 1 applying more spin to the cue ball?
I think it may apply more curve to the cue ball but I am not sure about more spin.
Thanks,
JoeyA
I compared my OB 1 shaft to another cue which had a larger tip diameter and a different taper and of course a different tip and discovered that while shooting the same shot over and over with the same amount of side English that the cue ball traveled to a similar location with both shafts. The OB1 however deflected the cue ball only about 1/4" versus the flat laminated shaft/cue deflected the cue ball about 2".
I don't know what to make of this and paid close attention to aiming at the same exact spot, applying the same amount of side spin. After thinking about it, the flat laminated, slightly larger diameter shaft may have given more spin to the cue ball than the OB 1. I find that hard to believe but will experiment further.
Any other re-thoughts about the OB 1 applying more spin to the cue ball?
I think it may apply more curve to the cue ball but I am not sure about more spin.
Thanks,
JoeyA