Shawn Armstrong said:It could be due to the fact that the shaft is roughly 15% glue.
Who the hell cares? I pot more balls with the OB-1...
Shawn Armstrong said:It could be due to the fact that the shaft is roughly 15% glue.
Then that's a good thing for you. I have no problems with anyone using OBs, or Preds, or Black Dots, or Mooris, or Kamuis, or whatever the latest and greatest is. It's great for the industry. Golf club manufacturers sell hype every year. "This is our hotest driver yet....." is the tag line every year at TaylorMade. Same with the laminated shaft market.Flex said:Who the hell cares? I pot more balls with the OB-1...
Shawn Armstrong said:Then that's a good thing for you. I have no problems with anyone using OBs, or Preds, or Black Dots, or Mooris, or Kamuis, or whatever the latest and greatest is. It's great for the industry. Golf club manufacturers sell hype every year. "This is our hotest driver yet....." is the tag line every year at TaylorMade. Same with the laminated shaft market.
I'm going to market my new line of shafts next year. They're standard one piece maple shafts. When people ask me about cueball deflection, I will tell them these are the latest design in shafts. They are the Mosconi shaft. When people ask me why I call them that, I will let them know what Willie's belief on side english was. "If you can't run 90% of your racks with no side english, you aren't ready to use it".
Detlev Rackow said:I know that I digress, but does the creator of the OB-1 happen to be a Star Wars-fan?
This comes to my mind whenever I read the name
Regards,
Detlev
seymore15074 said:You guys are breaking with them?! Omg, you know the ferrule is going to break, right? I saw a broken one about 2 months ago...from breaking with it.
Sensation said:Isn't it logical: less deflection (squirt) facilitates the game.
You gotta get used to it, sure. But eventually things are gonna be more regular = more precise = you better than before.
Still, anyone can get good with a regular shaft, it's just a little harder.
At Pro speed, deflection is a 1% concern. There is another 99% more important.
Too simplistic. Everytime I turn around on here I hear, it's the indian not the arrow, or a great player can shoot with a broom stick. The reality is that that it's actually the indian using the arrow of their choice, and that arrow is almost never a broom stick!Shawn Armstrong said:If all these shafts were the absolute nuts, EVERY pro would be using them. They are not. Johnny Archer still wins with a Cuetec, I mean Scorpion. Schmidt will continue to run 400+ whether he uses OB or Hunter or a Schon shaft. Indian, not arrow.
Flex said:Actually, I recall Mike Davis saying something about the way the Predator Z shaft plays with minimum cue ball squirt and how that really simplified shooting with english. Those are not his actual words, but the meaning of what he said. I'm not so sure he'd agree that squirt is only a "1% concern."
Coro said:I don't think they changed the construction at all, "whippy" wise anyway. by whippy you mean how the shaft is more flexible than say a solid maple one right?
Coro said:Yea i know what youre saying now. I agree, they have a lot more flex to them vs. the predators and any other shaft out there i've noticed. I mean it's not a bad thing unless you have like a big pet peve about "whippyness". Overall, i like them though, i started to play with one a couple days ago an think i'm gonna stay with it.