RBC said:I seem to get that one quite often!
We set out to build a low cue ball deflection, or squirt, cue shaft. We also happen to subscribe to the notion that squirt is affected primarily by "tip end mass" (TEM). Having said that, we set out to reduce the TEM of our shaft without violating anybody else's patents. Since the ferrule is the heaviest part of the tip end of any conventional shaft, that seemed like a good place to start.
All plastics are heavy. Maple is much lighter, but not quite strong or hard enough to do the job all by itself. So we came up with a method to make maple strong enough to handle the job.
We build the ferrules from flat laminations of maple. As we build the stack, we rotate each layer as compared to the one directly beneath it. By doing this, we have long grain maple pointed in all directions if viewed from the end of the shaft. This construction, along with a few other aspects of the shaft, make the ferrule strong. I even use one on my break cue!
Even with all the glue, our ferrule is still much lighter than any plastic and therefore gives us much less squirt.
When we started to play with the new shaft we were very surprised with how it played. Pretty much everyone who hit with it liked it. It was funny, because most of them did not talk much about squirt, they mostly talked about the way it felt and played.
Lets face it, cuemakers have been searching for years to make a cue that has a "wood to wood" hit, only to put a plastic ferrule on the end of the shaft. Well, now we have a true wood to wood hit with the ferrule itself.
So, as you see, there is a very good reason, or two, to have the wood ferrule. Besides, it looks cool too.
Royce Bunnell
obcues.com
Would you be selling the wood ferrule?
Last edited: