cueaddicts said:Maybe there was a shifty cue design thief on the loose back in the mid to late 70s....lol.I agree with Dick somewhat. Some things look very similar but the prong does indeed look odd, that's for sure. Never seen those chunky veneers on a JW, they look kind of Huebler-esque from that period. May be some kind of bastard cue. Spanky, you might try getting these pics to Bill to confirm.
pooltableproCP said:Here's a pic I just took of an old Viking I have laying under my computer desk.
[/IMG]![]()
i have a cue similar to spanky981's - 3/8x10 solid ivory joint except mine has a solid ebony butt-no inlays. cortland wrap- white with green specks. look carefully(read painstakingly slow) just below the junction of the buttcap and buttsleeve. mine has joss scratched on it not stamped- freehanded. easy to miss if you are not careful. both the original shafts match the joint rings on the butt. oh yeah my joint is split as well as spanky981's. bummer! 20 degree weather in a car and when the guy remembers it in the morning he runs, get it, and puts it in a warm house.CRACK! i still bought the cue anyway. edit:: mine has the chunky veneer as wellspanky981 said:nope. The buttsleeve is different. Plus a Ivory 3/8 10 joint and the rings are different. No check rings in buttsleeve. Plus the Viking is a ebony colored sleeve. Meaning plastic. This is a ebony wood sleeve. I dont believe a Viking. PLUS where is the logo. I would guess early Joss with a non matching shaft.
Mike