Cue Freak said:
Okay, so here's the thing...
Last night I played another SL6, so 5-5 race...Now, I consider myself a pretty strong 6, the other guy is up there as well. I played one defense the whole match, he played about five. I ended up beating him 5-0 in 13 innings. Here's the funny part, he and his whole team were crying and b1tch1ng about me being a 6...I surely don't think I am 7 material, what do you guys think? I do usually shoot this well or better when I play.
Sounds to me, by using "I usually shoot this well or better" you are looking for a little pat on the back and an "you should surely be a 7." So, here's your pat. Congrats. But, let's put all this ranking sh#$ into perspective. It depends on where you're from, number and caliber of players, big box or small, etc., etc. I've said it before. I played one year and went undefeated as a 7. I even offered (and quite often played) a bunch of the other sevens weight. I don't mean the last two either. I mean the seven, six and the break, eight and the last three, you know...real weight. I even gave up the four and the break to another seven, one night, just to prove a point. (That didn't go so well) What I'm trying to say is that the ranking system is a little off kilter. I quit playing APA for various reasons.
1. Hard to commit one night a week.
2. Whining when someone gets beat. (Even though the guy can't run 3 in a row.)
3. For all the money you pay, you might win a trip to Vegas. By the way, for all you spend, you can afford your own trip.
4. I can't stay focused long enough playing 3's and 4's. It's painful to sit and watch someone contemplate, call time out, ask info, and then dog it by at least a diamond.
5. The fun went out of it after about three weeks when I take things serious, and some just want to bang about.
6. Fu#$ it. I'd rather play for the cash. One on one. If I lose, I pay. If I make a bad game, I pay. But......If I do it right? The night out isn't on me.