Put him on ignore, you'll lose nothing and gain everything, as shall we, I doubt anyone even reads his posts, just look at them, who would read all that shit?
Pivoting systems and their relationship to CTE
- Thread starter Vorpal Cue
- Start date
Put him on ignore, you'll lose nothing and gain everything, as shall we, I doubt anyone even reads his posts, just look at them, who would read all that shit?
He turns everything into misery, not mistery, haven't you noticed by now? Why continue to communicate with him?
Just trying to use some math and physics to help him get a better understanding of the 'mechanics' behind pivoting systems. We're about half way to refuting objection #6 on the list in the first post. (anyone remember the original topic?) It's unfortunate he doesn't want to continue.
Do yourself .( and the rest of us ). a big favor and put him on Ignore.
It might also help, if a few times a day, you repeat the words:
" I will not respond to trolls ... I will not respond to trolls ... I will not respond to trolls "
.
.
.
'Larry'
You are in no way near to doing that...
not as the visuals have been defined.
Best Wishes.
Last edited:
6 is false and can be explained by correlating the change in table position with the rotation of the cue ball edge which adjusts the angle to the shot line.
I estimate about half way. Consideration of the zero angle shot line is the next half.
Everything must be taken a step at a time in small bites. I want to keep your objections confined to just a single point.
I'm out & will wait for the complete argument to be revealed.
Somewhere earlier you stated that you did not see how the 5 shots could all be made from the same visual...
or was that in PM?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
& Along with how the pivot has been defined.
The thing is I don't think we are even talking about the same method with the same restrictions.
Your initial list was very small in its descriptions. We qualified one of them 'a bit'.
Perhaps that was not enough or it has been forgotten.
Last edited:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENGLISH! View Post
I'm out & will wait for the complete argument to be revealed.
It's either now or never. I see one path to help you out and no other. I'm not going to try and refute many objections at once. I'm trying to lay out my points as you would with a proof in geometry class. If you don't like where the science and math is leading, you can bail out now if you wish. You've been asking for proof for a long time and here it is.
Somewhere earlier you stated that you did not see how the 5 shots could all be made from the same visual...
My opinion on the manner has been stated numerous times in this post. See post 24, page 2. No comprehendo Stanno OK?
or was that in PM?
Nice try.
How do YOU, Vorpal Cue, know for how long I've been asking for proof?
I don't know if you were in remedial classes or not
I was in advance math, trig, calculus, & physics & my teachers taught the lesson & THEN asked if there were any questions.
They did not wait to get confirmation that everyone understood each baby step.
I guess it's different strokes for different folks. Some teachers made me sit there while question upon question was asked & answered... some asked me if I got it... & let me go do something else.
If you do not want to put it all out here in your thread in one serving. That's fine.
That's up to you & it is YOUR choice.
You seem to be much like another in that regard.
Best Wishes.
Originally Posted by ENGLISH! View Post
I'm out & will wait for the complete argument to be revealed.
It's either now or never. I see one path to help you out and no other. I'm not going to try and refute many objections at once. I'm trying to lay out my points as you would with a proof in geometry class. If you don't like where the science and math is leading, you can bail out now if you wish. You've been asking for proof for a long time and here it is.
Somewhere earlier you stated that you did not see how the 5 shots could all be made from the same visual...
My opinion on the manner has been stated numerous times in this post. See post 24, page 2. No comprehendo Stanno OK?
or was that in PM?
Nice try.
How do YOU, Vorpal Cue, know for how long I've been asking for proof?
I don't know if you were in remedial classes or not
I was in advance math, trig, calculus, & physics & my teachers taught the lesson & THEN asked if there were any questions.
They did not wait to get confirmation that everyone understood each baby step.
I guess it's different strokes for different folks. Some teachers made me sit there while question upon question was asked & answered... some asked me if I got it... & let me go do something else.
If you do not want to put it all out here in your thread in one serving. That's fine.
That's up to you & it is YOUR choice.
You seem to be much like another in that regard.
Best Wishes.
CTE with 1/4 tip offset at one diamond CB to OB separation = 15 degree cut angle.
CTE with 1/4 tip offset at two diamond CB to OB separation = 7 degree cut angle.
CTE with 1/4 tip offset at three diamond CB to OB separation = 1 degree cut angle.
At four diamond separation one would be cutting the OB to the right.
Have fun
Last edited:
You've been asking for proof. Here it is. Enough said.
You've shown me nothing that I did not already know...
You were using the language improperly...
Then you added wording when I pointed that out.
Why do you want to stop & not show it all...
as a "lesson'.
Why do you want to pull teeth with me?
We've only just 'met'.
Haven't we?
Relative rotation took some doing and the movement of the tangent points was a surprise to you too. If you want more info, here it is!
I do not need to get from you what I already knew & already know.
I do find it a bit interesting how you ignore & talk around some matters...
& only respond to what you choose...
& you do not answer certain questions either.
That is typical CTEer tactics.
Look. You do not need me for this. Just show what you want to show & give the explanation.
That is... Unless you joined AZB & opened this thread with just ME in mind.
Best Wishes to You & Yours
Do you want the rest of the info or not?